Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Latest UmbrellaJS vs Cash
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Umbrella Selector vs Cash Selector
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/umbrellajs/umbrella.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/cash-dom/dist/cash.min.js"></script> <div id="test">Test</div>
Tests:
Umbrella Selector
var test = u("#test")
Cash Selector
var test = $("#test")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Umbrella Selector
Cash Selector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net provides a platform for users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, which are being compared against each other: "Umbrella Selector" and "Cash Selector". In essence, these test cases measure the performance of two different selectors in a JavaScript library: 1. UmbrellaJS (also known as umbrella.js) - a lightweight DOM selector library. 2. Cash - another popular DOM selector library. **What options are being compared?** The test cases compare the execution speed and efficiency of two different approaches for selecting elements on a DOM tree: 1. **Umbrella Selector**: uses the `u` function from UmbrellaJS to select an element. * The `u` function takes a CSS selector as input, parses it, and returns a handle to the selected element or null if no match is found. 2. **Cash Selector**: uses the `$` function from Cash to select an element. * The `$` function also takes a CSS selector as input, parses it, and returns a handle to the selected element or null if no match is found. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** Both selectors have their strengths and weaknesses: Umbrella Selector (U): Pros: * Lightweight (~2KB gzipped) * Fast and efficient * Supports advanced CSS selector syntax Cons: * May require additional setup for compatibility with older browsers Cash Selector ($): Pros: * Wide browser support, including older versions of Internet Explorer * Simple and easy to use API Cons: * Larger binary size (~6KB gzipped) compared to UmbrellaJS * May be slower than UmbrellaJS for complex selector scenarios **Library usage:** In both test cases, the libraries (UmbrellaJS and Cash) are used as-is, without any modifications or customizations. The `u` function in UmbrellaJS and the `$` function in Cash are used to select elements on a DOM tree. **Special JavaScript feature:** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in these benchmark cases. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers have introduced new features like CSS Custom Properties (CSS Variables) and IntersectionObserver API, which might be relevant for more comprehensive performance testing. **Other alternatives:** If you're interested in exploring alternative selector libraries, here are a few options: 1. **Sizzle**: Another lightweight DOM selector library. 2. **JQuery Selector**: The selector engine used by jQuery, known for its flexibility and power. 3. **Node.js' querySelectorAll()**: A built-in method in Node.js that allows selecting elements using CSS selectors. These alternatives might offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, size, and feature set, so it's essential to evaluate them based on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
UmbrellaJS vs Cash
Umbrella JS Lates
Vanilla JS, Cash, jQuery and Umbrella - GetID Speed Test
Cash VS Umbrella VS jquery VS vanilla selectors
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?