Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array Pushing2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Push vs Concat vs Spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var list = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
Tests:
Push
list.push(10);
Concat
list.concat([10]);
Spread
list = [...list, 10];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Push
Concat
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a microbenchmark test on MeasureThat.net, which is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript operations. The benchmark tests three different ways to push an element onto an array: using `push()`, concatenating the array with a new array containing the element, and using the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Push**: Using the `push()` method to add an element to the end of the array. 2. **Concat**: Concatenating the original array with a new array containing the element using the `concat()` method. 3. **Spread**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by spreading the original array and adding the element. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Push**: * Pros: Fastest, most efficient way to add an element to the end of an array. * Cons: May not be suitable for large arrays due to its O(1) amortized time complexity, which means it can become slower than other methods with very large arrays. 2. **Concat**: * Pros: Suitable for large arrays, as it has a linear time complexity (O(n)). * Cons: Can be slower than `push()` due to the overhead of creating a new array and concatenating the elements. 3. **Spread**: * Pros: Also suitable for large arrays, with a linear time complexity (O(n)), making it comparable to `concat()`. * Cons: May have some performance overhead due to the creation of a new array. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark tests use any external libraries. The operations are performed using standard JavaScript methods and operators. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The only special feature used in this benchmark is the spread operator (`...`), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This operator allows for creating a new array by spreading an existing array, making it easier to create new arrays with specific elements. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test alternative approaches to adding an element to an array, some other options could be considered: 1. **Array.prototype.at()**: This method was introduced in ECMAScript 2019 (ES11) and allows for accessing or modifying a single element at a specific index. 2. **Typed arrays**: If you're working with numeric data types, using typed arrays like Int32Array or Float64Array might be more efficient than using regular arrays. 3. **Native array operations**: Depending on the use case, native array operations like `map()`, `filter()`, and `reduce()` might provide better performance than manual loop-based approaches. Keep in mind that the choice of approach often depends on the specific requirements of your project, including factors such as data size, frequency of updates, and computational resources.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.push vs spread
array push
Javascript Push
Spread or Push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?