Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string_concat_vs_append
(version: 0)
Concatenation of two strings.
Comparing performance of:
string_append vs string_concat
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
string_append
const a = 'hello', b = 'world', c = a + b;
string_concat
const a = 'hello', b = 'world', c = a.concat(b);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string_append
string_concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its options. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing the performance difference between two approaches for concatenating strings in JavaScript: 1. Using the `+` operator (string appends) 2. Using the `concat()` method (string concatenates) In other words, the benchmark measures how fast it is to concatenate two strings using either of these methods. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: * **String Appends (`a + b`)**: This approach uses the `+` operator to concatenate two strings. It creates a new string by adding the characters of both input strings. * **String Concatenation (`a.concat(b)`)**: This approach uses the `concat()` method to concatenate two strings. It returns a new string that is the result of concatenating the input strings. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **String Appends (`+` operator)**: + Pros: - Typically faster, since it avoids creating an intermediate array. - Easier to understand and write in many situations. + Cons: - Can lead to temporary objects being created on the heap if used inside a loop. - May not be suitable for very large strings or performance-critical code. * **String Concatenation (`concat()` method)**: + Pros: - Less prone to temporary object creation issues (e.g., when concatenating many strings). - Can be more suitable for performance-critical code that needs to handle large strings. + Cons: - Typically slower, since it involves creating an intermediate array and then copying its contents into a new string. **Library usage** In neither of the provided benchmark definitions is any library used. However, if a library like Lodash were used, the `concat()` method would likely be called on an instance of the Lodash `string` utility, which provides various string concatenation functions. **Special JS features or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definitions. They appear to use standard JavaScript syntax and don't include any advanced concepts like async/await, Promises, or decorators. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to test other approaches for concatenating strings, some alternative methods could be: * Using a template string (e.g., `${a} ${b}`) instead of the `+` operator. * Creating an array and then joining its elements with a separator (e.g., `[a, b].join('')`). * Using a StringBuilder-like library or implementation (if desired). However, for most use cases, using the `+` operator or the `concat()` method is sufficient, and these alternatives may not provide significant performance benefits.
Related benchmarks:
Javascript 'concat()' vs '+' for strings
Javascript 'concat()' vs '+' for strings
string concat: concat vs +
Javascript 'concat()' vs '+'
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?