Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test_123
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
test_1 vs test_2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['1', '2', '3'];
Tests:
test_1
arr.sort()
test_2
arr.map(el => Number(el))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test_1
test_2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests two different operations on an array of strings: `arr.sort()` and `arr.map(el => Number(el))`. Let's break down what each does and the implications: **Test Case 1: `arr.sort()`** * **What it does:** This method sorts the elements of the array (`['1', '2', '3']`) in ascending order, resulting in `['1', '2', '3']`. * **Pros:** Efficient for sorting arrays of comparable items (in this case, strings). * **Cons:** Can be slower for large arrays or if comparisons are complex. Doesn't return a new array; it modifies the original array in place. **Test Case 2: `arr.map(el => Number(el))`** * **What it does:** This method iterates over each element (`el`) in the array and applies a transformation function (`Number(el)`). This function converts each string element to its numerical equivalent. The result is a new array containing `[1, 2, 3]`. * **Pros:** Creates a new array without modifying the original, useful for preserving data. Can be used with various transformations beyond simple type conversions. * **Cons:** Potentially less efficient than `sort()` if the operation on each element is complex. **Other Considerations** * **Library Usage:** No specific libraries are used in these test cases. * **JavaScript Features:** This benchmark utilizes standard JavaScript array methods (`sort()`, `map()`), making it accessible to most JavaScript developers. **Alternatives** * **Custom Sorting Logic:** You could implement your own sorting algorithm instead of using `arr.sort()` for more fine-grained control over the ordering. * **Other Transformation Methods:** Beyond `map()`, there are other methods like `filter()`, `reduce()`, and `forEach()` that can be used to process array elements. **Remember:** Benchmark results can vary based on factors such as the browser, operating system, hardware, and JavaScript engine version.
Related benchmarks:
arr delete: length=0 vs []
Array empty
Array empty 2
Obj vs Arr Js raed
array.length = 0 vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?