Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat vs flat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
flat vs cocat
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
flat
const array = [[1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8]].flat()
cocat
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4].concat([5, 6, 7, 8]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
flat
cocat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:144.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/144.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 144 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=622268" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
cocat
20.1M/s
flat
10.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
cocat
20,103,564 Ops/sec
flat
10,325,249 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two array flattening methods in JavaScript: `concat()` and `flat()`. The test cases are designed to simulate real-world scenarios where arrays need to be flattened, such as when working with data from external sources or parsing JSON responses. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **`concat()`**: This method concatenates two or more arrays and returns a new array with the concatenated elements. 2. **`flat()`:** This method returns an array with all sub-array elements concatenated into it recursively up to a specified depth. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **`concat()`**: Pros: * Wide support across browsers and Node.js versions * Easy to implement and understand * Can be used for nested arrays of arbitrary depth Cons: * Creates a new array, which can lead to performance issues with large datasets * Requires explicit depth specification (e.g., `flat(Infinity)`) for deep nesting **`flat()`**: Pros: * More efficient than `concat()` for large datasets, as it avoids creating new arrays * Supports optional depth specification (default is 1), making it suitable for shallow nesting Cons: * Limited support across older browsers and Node.js versions * May not work as expected with very large or deeply nested arrays **Library: undefined** Neither `concat()` nor `flat()` uses any external libraries. They are built-in methods in JavaScript. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** `flat()` is a relatively new method introduced in ECMAScript 2019 (ES10). It's an efficient way to flatten arrays, making it a popular choice among developers. **Alternative Approaches** Other ways to flatten arrays include: 1. **Using `reduce()`**: This method creates a new array by iteratively applying a reduction function to the elements of the original array. 2. **Using `map()` and `concat()`:** This approach involves mapping each element in the original array to an array containing that element, then concatenating those arrays together. These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and support across browsers and Node.js versions. In conclusion, the benchmark on MeasureThat.net provides a useful insight into the performance differences between two common array flattening methods in JavaScript. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which method to use depending on their specific requirements and constraints.
Related benchmarks
flat vs concat test
Concat vs Flat 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?