Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test Includes vs some
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Includes vs some
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var testArray = ["one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten"]; var testValue = "seven";
Tests:
Includes
var result = testArray.includes(testValue);
some
var result = testArray.some((v) => v === testValue)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Includes
some
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two JavaScript methods: `includes` and `some`. The script preparation code creates an array called `testArray` with 10 string elements, including the target value `"seven"`. The HTML preparation code is empty. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Includes**: This test case uses the `includes` method to check if a specific element exists in the `testArray`. 2. **some**: This test case uses the `some` method with an arrow function to iterate over the elements of `testArray` and check if any of them match the target value. **Library and Purpose** The only library used in this benchmark is not explicitly mentioned, but based on the code, it appears to be a standard JavaScript library. The `includes` and `some` methods are built-in methods in JavaScript's Array prototype, so no external library is required. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There is one special feature being tested: arrow functions (introduced in ECMAScript 2015). Arrow functions are a concise way to define small functions. In this case, the `some` method uses an arrow function to iterate over the elements of the array. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **Includes**: This method iterates over the array until it finds the target value or reaches the end. If the value is found, it returns a boolean indicating whether the value was found. 2. **some**: This method short-circuits as soon as it finds the first matching element. It does not iterate over the entire array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Includes**: * Pros: Can be faster for smaller arrays or when the target value is known to exist in the array. * Cons: May be slower for larger arrays, as it needs to iterate over all elements. 2. **some**: * Pros: Faster for large arrays, as it can short-circuit and stop iterating as soon as a match is found. * Cons: Can be slower if the target value does not exist in the array, as it still needs to iterate over all elements. **Other Alternatives** If you needed to check if an element exists in an array but didn't want to use the `includes` method or `some` method with a callback function, you could consider using other approaches: * Using `indexOf()` and checking if the result is -1. * Creating a custom loop that iterates over the array and checks each element. * Using a library like Lodash's `some()` function (although this would introduce additional dependencies). Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics depending on the specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
IndexOf vs Includes array of numbers
Includes (array) vs Some (array)
array indexOf vs includes vs some using numbers
Array Indexation vs. Array Access
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?