Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs Object.assign
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var firstObject = { sampleData_1: 'Hello world_1', sampleData_2: 'Hello world_2', sampleData_3: 'Hello world_3', sampleData_4: 'Hello world_4', sampleData_5: 'Hello world_5', sampleData_6: 'Hello world_6', sampleData_7: 'Hello world_7', } var secondObject = { moreData_1: 'foo bar 1', moreData_2: 'foo bar 2', moreData_3: 'foo bar 3', moreData_4: 'foo bar 4', moreData_5: 'foo bar 5', moreData_6: 'foo bar 6', moreData_7: 'foo bar 7', }
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two ways to merge two objects in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()`. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines two objects, `firstObject` and `secondObject`, which contain sample data. These objects are used as input for the benchmark. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided, so we can assume that this benchmark focuses solely on JavaScript performance. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Using the spread operator**: This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to merge `firstObject` and `secondObject`. The syntax looks like this: `const finalObject = {...firstObject, ...secondObject};` 2. **Using Object.assign()**: This test case uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge `firstObject` and `secondObject`. The syntax looks like this: `const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject);` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Using the spread operator**: * Pros: + More concise and readable syntax + Can be more efficient than `Object.assign()` for simple object merges * Cons: + May not work as expected with certain types of objects or data structures (e.g., arrays) 2. **Using Object.assign()**: * Pros: + More widely supported and compatible across different browsers and environments + Can be used to merge multiple objects in a single call * Cons: + May require more code and setup than the spread operator syntax **Library and Syntax** There is no library or special JavaScript feature being used in this benchmark. The tests rely on built-in JavaScript features like the spread operator and `Object.assign()`. **Other Considerations** When writing performance benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like: * Sample size and variability * System configuration and hardware * Browser version and compatibility * Data distribution and representation In this case, the benchmark uses a small sample of data and assumes a consistent system configuration. However, in real-world scenarios, you may need to consider more complex factors to ensure accurate results. **Alternatives** If you want to explore alternative approaches or variations on this benchmark, here are some ideas: * Compare other object merge methods, like `Object.merge()` (not a standard method) or using `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())` * Use different types of data structures, such as arrays instead of objects * Experiment with varying levels of data complexity and size * Test the performance of these methods in more extreme environments, like mobile devices or older browsers
Related benchmarks:
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - forked for equivalent functionality
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance to merge into new object
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - non-destructive merge
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign vs for-in loop performance
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign vs for-in loop safe performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?