Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
append vs. appendChild/createTextNode
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
append vs appendChild/createTextNode vs textContent
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
append
const container = document.createElement('li'); container.append('0');
appendChild/createTextNode
const container = document.createElement('li'); container.appendChild(document.createTextNode('0'));
textContent
const container = document.createElement('li'); container.textContent = '0';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
append
appendChild/createTextNode
textContent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different methods for setting text content in an HTML element: 1. `append` 2. `appendChild/createTextNode` The test also includes a control case that uses `textContent`. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **`append`**: This method appends a string to the end of the existing child nodes of the element. 2. **`appendChild/createTextNode`**: This method creates a new text node and appends it to the end of the element's child nodes. **Pros and Cons** * `append`: This method can be faster for small strings, but it can lead to performance issues when dealing with large strings or many child nodes, as it involves inserting a new DOM node at each append operation. * `appendChild/createTextNode`: This method is more efficient for larger strings, as it only creates a single text node and appends it to the end of the element's child nodes. However, it may be slower than `append` for very small strings. **Library/Features Used** The benchmark uses the following library: * None However, note that the benchmark is focused on basic DOM manipulation, which doesn't require any specific libraries beyond the standard JavaScript features. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None mentioned in this explanation. The benchmark focuses on basic DOM manipulation using standard JavaScript syntax. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to set text content, some other approaches include: * Using `innerHTML` instead of `textContent`: This method sets the entire HTML content of an element, which can be slower and less efficient than setting text content directly. * Using a library like jQuery or React, which provide optimized methods for setting text content. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided benchmark preparation code is empty, indicating that no specific setup or initialization is required to run the test cases. I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.assign vs object.assign vs spread
Merge objects: Lodash vs Native112312321321xcx
clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign vs JSON.parse(JSON.Stringify())
Template Literal vs Tagged Template Literal
Lodash merge vs mergedeep 1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?