Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Includes vs Ternary Comparison
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array Creation + Includes vs Comparisons
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var input = "Orange";
Tests:
Array Creation + Includes
["Banana", "Apple", "Orange", "Grapes", "Kiwi"].includes(input);
Comparisons
"Banana" === input || "Apple" === input || "Orange" === input || "Grapes" === input || "Kiwi" === input;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array Creation + Includes
Comparisons
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using the `includes()` method for array searching and using traditional comparisons (e.g., `===`) for string matching. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Array Search with `includes()`:** This approach uses the `includes()` method to search for an element in a predefined array. 2. **String Comparisons:** This approach uses traditional comparisons (e.g., `===`) to check if a string matches a predefined value. **Pros and Cons** **Array Search with `includes()`:** Pros: * More readable and concise code * Less prone to typos or errors, as the method is more explicit Cons: * May have performance overhead due to the method's implementation * Might not be supported in older browsers or environments **String Comparisons:** Pros: * Generally faster than using `includes()`, especially for small arrays * Wide support across browsers and environments Cons: * More prone to typos or errors, as the comparisons are more implicit * May require additional code to handle edge cases (e.g., null or undefined values) **Library Used** In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's likely that the `includes()` method is implemented by a standard JavaScript library or engine. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses only standard JavaScript features and is straightforward to understand. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark prepares an input string (`"Orange"`), which will be searched for in both test cases. * The `Array Creation + Includes` test case creates a new array with the predefined values, which may introduce additional overhead due to array creation. * The `Comparisons` test case only checks for equality between the input string and each predefined value. This might not accurately represent real-world usage scenarios. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for searching arrays or strings could include: * Using a regular expression (e.g., `/^Orange$/`) * Implementing a custom search algorithm * Using a different data structure, such as a Trie or a HashMap However, the `includes()` method and traditional comparisons are well-established and widely supported in modern JavaScript environments.
Related benchmarks:
not includes vs. not equal to
two condition if vs includes compare
Compare Or vs Includes
String equals vs String.includes
equals vs includes (one value)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?