Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Flatten array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using reducer vs Using generators vs Recursive push flatten vs Using array flat
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = Array(10_0).fill(Array(10).fill(Array(10).fill(0))) function flattenReducer(arr) { return arr.reduce((acc, cur) => acc.concat(Array.isArray(cur) ? flattenReducer(cur) : cur), []); }; function* flattenGenerator(arr) { for (const val of arr) { Array.isArray(val) ? yield* flattenGenerator(val) : yield val; } } function recursiveFlatten(arr) { const result = []; arr.forEach(item => { if (Array.isArray(item)) { result.push(...recursiveFlatten(item)); } else { result.push(item); } }); return result; };
Tests:
Using reducer
flattenReducer(arr)
Using generators
[...flattenGenerator(arr)]
Recursive push flatten
recursiveFlatten(arr)
Using array flat
arr.flat(Infinity)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using reducer
Using generators
Recursive push flatten
Using array flat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided Benchmark Definition JSON represents a single benchmark for flattening an array in JavaScript. The script preparation code includes three different approaches: 1. `flattenReducer(arr)`: Uses the `reduce()` method with a custom reducer function to flatten the array. 2. `flattenGenerator(arr)`: Uses a generator function (`*` denotes that it's a generator function, not a regular function) to flatten the array. 3. `recursiveFlatten(arr)`: A recursive function that pushes each item from the array into a result array. The script preparation code is written in JavaScript, using modern syntax and features like arrow functions (`=>`) and template literals (`\r\n` is used for line breaks). **Options Compared** In this benchmark, four different approaches are compared: 1. `flattenReducer(arr)`: Uses the `reduce()` method. 2. `flattenGenerator(arr)`: Uses a generator function. 3. `recursiveFlatten(arr)`: A recursive function that pushes each item into a result array. 4. `arr.flat(Infinity)`: Uses the built-in `flat()` method with an infinite depth. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief overview of each approach: 1. **`flattenReducer(arr)`**: Pros: Easy to implement, efficient use of memory (only creates one result array). Cons: May not be as performant as other methods due to the overhead of `reduce()`. 2. **`flattenGenerator(arr)`**: Pros: Can be more performant than recursive functions, allows for asynchronous iteration. Cons: Requires a good understanding of generators and may have additional memory usage. 3. **`recursiveFlatten(arr)`**: Pros: Simple to understand, easy to implement. Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of recursive function calls, can cause stack overflow for large inputs. 4. **`arr.flat(Infinity)`**: Pros: Built-in method, efficient use of memory (only creates one result array). Cons: May not work well with nested arrays of varying depths, can lead to performance issues if `Infinity` is used. **Library and Special JS Features** In this benchmark, there are no libraries or special JavaScript features being tested. The script preparation code only uses built-in JavaScript features and syntax. **Other Considerations** When comparing these approaches, it's essential to consider factors like: * Memory usage: How much memory does each approach use? * Performance: Which approach is faster? * Scalability: How well do each approaches handle large inputs? **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches that could be included in a benchmark for flattening an array include: 1. `for` loop: A simple iterative approach using a `for` loop. 2. `Array.prototype.forEach()`: Using the `forEach()` method to iterate over the array and push each item into a result array. 3. `Array.prototype.map()`: Using the `map()` method to create a new array with flattened elements. These alternatives can provide additional insights into different approaches and help identify which one is most efficient in various scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Array concat vs spread operator vs push for array flat implementation
Flatmaps with native (large array)
Basic Array processing benchmark
Recursive reduce vs recursive flatMap
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?