Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Classnames vs CLSX V2
(version: 0)
Compare CLSX vs Classnames vs templateLiterals
Comparing performance of:
classnames string vs clsx string vs classnames real case vs clsx real case
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/classnames/2.3.2/index.min.js'></script> <script src='https://unpkg.com/clsx@1.2.1/dist/clsx.min.js'></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/fast-classnames/umd.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'style'; var obj = { 'style-2': true, 'style-3': false, 'style-4': true, } var arr = ['style-5', 'style-6']
Tests:
classnames string
let result = window.classNames(str, 'test classname', 'WORKS', 'test classname', 'test classname')
clsx string
let result = window.clsx(str, 'test classname', 'WORKS','test classname', 'test classname', 'test classname')
classnames real case
let result = window.fastClassnames(str, true && 'test classname', false && 'WORKS', null && "failed", undefined && "null", Math.random() > 0.2 && "YES")
clsx real case
let result = window.clsx(str, true && 'test classname', false && 'WORKS', null && "failed", undefined && "null", Math.random() > 0.2 && "YES")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
classnames string
clsx string
classnames real case
clsx real case
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Overview** The benchmark compares three JavaScript libraries: 1. Classnames (also known as classNames) 2. CLSX (Classnames V2) 3. Fast-Classnames These libraries are used to dynamically generate class names for HTML elements. The benchmark tests how these libraries perform when creating class names with different syntax and scenarios. **Options being compared** Here are the options being compared: * Classnames: + String-based method + Real-world case (with conditionals, null/undefined values, etc.) * CLSX: + String-based method + Real-world case (with conditionals, null/undefined values, etc.) * Fast-Classnames: + Real-world case (with conditionals, null/undefined values, etc.) **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. Classnames: + Pros: Lightweight, easy to use, well-maintained + Cons: Limited functionality, may not perform as well with complex scenarios 2. CLSX: + Pros: Improved performance, added features (e.g., support for null/undefined values) + Cons: Slightly heavier weight, some users might find the syntax unfamiliar 3. Fast-Classnames: + Pros: Optimized for real-world use cases, adds support for conditionals and null/undefined values + Cons: New library, some users might be hesitant to adopt a new library **Library explanations** * Classnames: A lightweight JavaScript library used to dynamically generate class names for HTML elements. It provides a simple and easy-to-use API. * CLSX (Classnames V2): An updated version of the original Classnames library. It improves performance and adds support for some advanced features, such as handling null/undefined values. * Fast-Classnames: A custom implementation that aims to optimize the performance of class name generation. It's designed specifically for real-world use cases and provides additional features like conditional logic. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is no specific JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark, aside from the differences between Classnames, CLSX, and Fast-Classnames. The focus is on comparing the performance of these libraries under various scenarios. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative class name generation solutions, some other options include: * jQuery's `.addClassClass()` method * Lodash's `classify` function * Vanilla JavaScript's built-in string methods (e.g., `split()`, `join()`)
Related benchmarks:
Classnames vs CLSX vs Alternatives vs Template Literals
Classnames vs CLSX vs Alternatives (2)
Classnames vs CLSX vs Alternatives vs custom
Classnames vs CLSX vs Alternatives (Nov 27, 2023)
Classnames vs CLSX vs Alternatives 03.25.2024
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?