Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelector vs getElementBy
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
by vs query
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<h1 id="id"></h1>
Script Preparation code:
var n = []
Tests:
by
n.push(document.getElementById('id'))
query
n.push(document.querySelector('#id'))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
by
query
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, along with the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two methods for retrieving an HTML element using JavaScript: `document.getElementById` (by) and `document.querySelector` (query). The goal is to determine which method is faster in various scenarios. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code initializes an empty array `n`. This variable will be used to store the execution results of both methods. For example, when running a test case like "by", `n.push(document.getElementById('id'))` would add a new element to the array. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code creates a simple webpage with a single `<h1>` element and an ID attribute set to `"id"`: `<h1 id="id"></h1>`. This element will be used as the target for both methods being compared. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. "by" (using `document.getElementById`): ```javascript n.push(document.getElementById('id')); ``` 2. "query" (using `document.querySelector`): ```javascript n.push(document.querySelector('#id')); ``` **Library: DOM Methods** Both methods use the Document Object Model (DOM) to interact with the HTML document. Specifically, `document.getElementById` returns the element at the specified ID, while `document.querySelector` uses a CSS selector to match the element. The purpose of these libraries is to provide a way for JavaScript code to access and manipulate the structure of an HTML document. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two existing methods. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to `document.getElementById` and `document.querySelector`, consider the following options: 1. **querySelectorAll**: Similar to `querySelector`, but returns all elements that match the CSS selector instead of just one. 2. **getAttribute()` and **getAttributeNames()**: Alternative methods for retrieving attribute values and iterating over attribute names, respectively. 3. **requestAnimationFrame()` and **setTimeout()`: For asynchronous operations, use these functions to schedule tasks without blocking the main thread. In summary, this benchmark compares the performance of two common JavaScript methods for retrieving HTML elements: `document.getElementById` and `document.querySelector`. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach can help you make informed decisions about which method to use in your own code.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector vs getElementById
querySelector() vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
querySelector vs getElementsById
querySelector vs getElementById & getElementsByClassName
getElementById vs querySelector 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?