Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
r vs j
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
R vs J
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var data = [{ row: 1, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 3, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 3, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 4, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 5, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 5, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 6, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 7, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 8, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 9, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 12, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 22, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 32, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 42, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 52, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 62, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 72, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 82, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 92, column: 20, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 29, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 28, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 27, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 26, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 25, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 24, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 23, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 2, column: 22, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 20, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 29, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 28, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 27, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 276, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 26, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 25, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 24, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 23, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 22, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 21, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 22, column: 222, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 233, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 32, column: 32, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 23, column: 23, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 122, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 342, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 562, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 782, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 99, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, { row: 82, column: 2, sheet: 'W', }, ] var data2 = data.concat([{ row: 11, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 131, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 141, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 151, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 161, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 171, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1712, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 112, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 113, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 111, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 141, column: 31, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 131, column: 32, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 151, column: 5, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 112, column: 6, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 12, column: 67, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 123, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 133, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 143, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 153, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 163, column: 3, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 173, column: 35, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 172, column: 35, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 12, column: 33, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 13, column: 365, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 11, column: 33, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1, column: 361, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1, column: 372, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1, column: 57, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1, column: 68, sheet: 'D' }, { row: 1, column: 67, sheet: 'D' }, ])
Tests:
R
R.differenceWith((item1, item2) => item1.row === item2.row && item1.column === item2.column && item1.sheet === item2.sheet, data, data2)
J
data2.filter((item1) => data.find(item2 => item1.row === item2.row && item1.column === item2.column && item1.sheet === item2.sheet)?.length === 0)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
R
J
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
It looks like we have a benchmarking result for an optimization function, specifically the `differenceWith` function from Ramda. The test consists of two cases: one where the input data is compared to itself using `R.differenceWith`, and another where the input data is filtered to remove duplicates using `data2.filter`. To answer the question, I'll need to analyze the benchmark results. **Benchmark Results Analysis** The latest benchmark result shows that: 1. The execution time for `R.differenceWith` (case R) is 356.29 seconds per second, with a total of 356289 executions per second. 2. The execution time for `data2.filter` (case J) is 46.27 seconds per second, with a total of 92648 executions per second. **Conclusion** Based on the benchmark results, it appears that `R.differenceWith` is significantly faster than `data2.filter`. The Ramda implementation seems to be optimized for this specific use case, and it provides better performance compared to the vanilla JavaScript filter method. Therefore, if you need to optimize the filtering of duplicates in your data, using `differenceWith` from Ramda may be a good choice. However, keep in mind that this optimization is specific to this particular use case, and other optimizations might be needed for different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
non-unique-elements
Table appending
Array.from vs Array spread with mapping of values2
indexof vs set123
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?