Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array Initialization Types v3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array Constructor vs Array Size Constructor vs Array Literal vs Fill Map
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var times = 5000;
Tests:
Array Constructor
var a = new Array(); for (var i = 0; i <= times; i++) { a.push(1337) }
Array Size Constructor
var b = new Array(times); for (var i = 0; i <= times; i++) { b.push(1337) }
Array Literal
var c = []; for (var i = 0; i <= times; i++) { c.push(1337) }
Fill Map
new Array(10).fill().map((_arg) => 1337)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array Constructor
Array Size Constructor
Array Literal
Fill Map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that provides metadata about the test suite, including: * `Name`: A human-readable name for the benchmark (Array Initialization Types v3). * `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark (null in this case). * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are placeholders for code that prepares the test environment. In this case, there's no actual script preparation code provided. The script itself is embedded directly in the benchmark definition. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of four individual test cases: 1. **Array Constructor**: Tests the performance of creating an array using the `new Array()` constructor. 2. **Array Size Constructor**: Tests the performance of creating an array using the `new Array(times)` syntax, where `times` is a variable set to 5000. 3. **Array Literal**: Tests the performance of creating an array using the literal notation (`[]`). 4. **Fill Map**: Tests the performance of creating an array using the `fill()` method and then applying a transformation function to it (using arrow functions). **Library Usage** None of the test cases explicitly use a library, but we can infer that the benchmark is designed for testing JavaScript engine-specific features. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are two notable features: 1. **Arrow Functions**: The `Fill Map` test case uses an arrow function to transform the array created by `fill()`. 2. **Variable `times`**: The `Array Size Constructor` and `Fill Map` test cases use a variable `times` set to 5000. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of four different approaches to creating arrays: 1. **Array Constructor** 2. **Array Size Constructor** (using `new Array(times)`) 3. **Array Literal** (`[]`) 4. **Fill Map** (using `fill()` and arrow functions) **Pros and Cons** Each approach has its own pros and cons: 1. **Array Constructor**: Generally faster, but may have memory allocation overhead. 2. **Array Size Constructor**: May be slower due to the need for explicit size specification, but can avoid memory allocation overhead. 3. **Array Literal**: Fastest, as it avoids any function calls or variable assignments. 4. **Fill Map**: Slower than literal notation, but can offer benefits like improved code readability and maintainability. **Other Alternatives** To improve performance or achieve different trade-offs, other alternatives could be explored: * Using `int32Array` or `uint8Array` instead of `Array` for specific use cases. * Optimizing the benchmark script to reduce overhead (e.g., by reducing the size of the array or using smaller data types). * Using specialized libraries or frameworks that offer optimized array creation and manipulation. Keep in mind that this is a simplified analysis, and actual performance differences may vary depending on the JavaScript engine, browser, and specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
array test
Array isArray vs instanceof
Array isArray vs instanceof 2
Array isArray vs typeof
instanceof Array vs Array.isArray
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?