Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Battle of the bools
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Boolean vs Double negate vs Boolejan vs Boolejan2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var bFalse = false; var sEmpty = ''; var sFilled = 'Foo'; var nZero = 0; var nOne = 1; var Boolejan = (input) => !!input var Boolejan2 = (input) => !input ? false : true
Tests:
Boolean
Boolean(bFalse) Boolean(sEmpty) Boolean(sFilled) Boolean(nZero) Boolean(nOne)
Double negate
!!bFalse !!sEmpty !!sFilled !!nZero !!nOne
Boolejan
Boolejan(bFalse) Boolejan(sEmpty) Boolejan(sFilled) Boolejan(nZero) Boolejan(nOne)
Boolejan2
Boolejan2(bFalse) Boolejan2(sEmpty) Boolejan2(sFilled) Boolejan2(nZero) Boolejan2(nOne)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Boolean
Double negate
Boolejan
Boolejan2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and its test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined as follows: ```javascript var Boolejan = (input) => !!input var Boolejan2 = (input) => !input ? false : true ``` These two functions are designed to test different approaches for evaluating boolean values. The first function, `Boolejan`, uses the "double bang" operator (`!!`) to negate a value, while the second function, `Boolejan2`, uses a conditional expression (`!input ? false : true`) to achieve the same result. **Test Cases** There are four test cases: 1. **Boolean**: Tests the original implementations of the `Boolean` function and its variations. 2. **Double negate**: Tests the double bang operator (`!!`) on various boolean values. 3. **Boolejan**: Tests the `Boolejan` function's implementation. 4. **Boolejan2**: Tests the `Boolejan2` function's implementation. **Options Compared** The options being compared are: * **Boolean function**: The original implementation of the `Boolean` function and its variations ( Boolejan, Boolejan2). * **Double bang operator (`!!`)**: A simple way to negate a boolean value. * **Conditional expression**: An alternative way to evaluate a boolean value using an if-else statement. **Pros and Cons** * **Boolejan**: This implementation uses the `!!` operator, which can be slower than the double bang due to the overhead of the conditional evaluation. However, it's more concise and expressive. * **Boolejan2**: This implementation uses a conditional expression, which can lead to unnecessary computations if not optimized correctly. It's also less readable than Boolejan. * **Double negate**: The use of the `!!` operator is straightforward but may not be as efficient as the original implementations. **Library Considerations** None of the test cases explicitly use any libraries beyond the standard JavaScript syntax. However, it's worth noting that in a real-world scenario, the performance difference between these implementations might be negligible unless optimized for specific use cases or platforms. **Other Alternatives** There are alternative ways to implement boolean evaluations, such as: * Using bitwise operators (e.g., `x === 0 ? false : true`) * Utilizing specialized libraries or frameworks (e.g., React's truthy/falsy checks) * Leveraging built-in functions like `Number()` and `isNaN()` Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be optimized for performance, readability, or compatibility with all environments. **Benchmarking Considerations** When benchmarking such microbenchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like: * **Hardware**: The type of device (Desktop, Mobile, etc.) and its specific hardware characteristics. * **Software**: The browser version, operating system, and other software configurations used. * **Compilation**: Any optimization flags or settings that might impact performance. The benchmark results provided show the execution speed differences between these implementations. However, to draw meaningful conclusions, it's crucial to consider the context in which this code will be deployed.
Related benchmarks:
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript 2
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript 3
Booean coercion vs Boolejan coercion vs Boolejan 2 coercion
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?