Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.from()[0] vs Set.entries().next().value
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.from vs Set.entries()
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.from
var fooSet = new Set(); for(var i=0;i<1000;i++) { fooSet.add(i); } var other = Array.from(fooSet)[0];
Set.entries()
var fooSet = new Set(); for(var i=0;i<1000;i++) { fooSet.add(i); } var other = fooSet.entries().next().value;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.from
Set.entries()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of each approach. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two ways to extract the first element from a set in JavaScript: 1. **Array.from()**: This method converts the set into an array and returns the first element. 2. **Set.entries().next().value**: This method uses the `entries()` method of the set, which returns an iterator over its elements, and then calls `next()` on it to get the first element. **Options compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: * **Array.from()**: This approach converts the entire set into an array and then takes the first element. This can be efficient if you need to access all elements of the set or perform operations on them. * **Set.entries().next().value**: This approach uses the `entries()` method to get an iterator over the set's elements, which is more memory-efficient than converting the entire set into an array. However, it may incur additional overhead due to the iterator. **Pros and Cons** * **Array.from()**: + Pros: Easy to implement, can be efficient for large datasets. + Cons: Converts the entire set into an array, which can be memory-intensive. * **Set.entries().next().value**: + Pros: More memory-efficient, doesn't require converting the set into an array. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the iterator. **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, `Array.from()` is a built-in JavaScript method that converts an iterable object (such as a set) into an array. Its purpose is to provide a convenient way to convert objects into arrays for further processing or manipulation. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark, but note that some older browsers might not support `Set.entries().next().value` due to its introduction in modern browsers. However, most modern browsers and JavaScript engines support this method. **Other alternatives** If you need to extract the first element from a set in a different way, here are some alternative approaches: * Using the `values()` method of the set, which returns an iterator over its elements: `var other = fooSet.values().next().value;` * Using a custom implementation to iterate over the set's elements and retrieve the first one. Overall, the benchmark provides a simple way to compare two different approaches to extracting the first element from a set in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Array.from() vs new Array()
my Array.from() vs new Array()
Array.from() vs new Array() - empty
Array.from() vs new A
Array() vs Array.from() fill
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?