Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
append - simple -array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
append - simple vs append - arraay
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<body></body>
Tests:
append - simple
const p1 = document.createElement("p"); const p2 = document.createElement("p"); const p3 = document.createElement("p"); document.body.append(p1); document.body.append(p2); document.body.append(p3);
append - arraay
const p1 = document.createElement("p"); const p2 = document.createElement("p"); const p3 = document.createElement("p"); document.body.append([p1,p2,p3]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
append - simple
append - arraay
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmark and its options in detail. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance of adding elements to an HTML document using two different approaches: 1. **Simple**: Creating three separate `<p>` elements and appending them to the `body` element one by one. 2. **Array**: Passing an array of three `<p>` elements to the `append()` method, which appends all elements in the array at once. **Options being compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: 1. **Separate elements**: Creating individual elements and appending them one by one. * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, allows for more control over each element's properties. * Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of creating and appending multiple elements. 2. **Array**: Passing an array of elements to the `append()` method. * Pros: Can be faster since the browser can batch the append operations, reducing overhead. * Cons: May require more memory for the temporary array, and might not work as expected if the array contains large or complex objects. **Other considerations** 1. **Browser support**: The benchmark is running on Chrome 106, so it's essential to ensure that both approaches are compatible with this browser version. 2. **Device platform**: The test is running on a desktop device (Windows), which might affect performance compared to mobile devices or other platforms. 3. **Operating system**: Windows is used as the operating system, which may impact performance due to differences in underlying architectures or system libraries. **Library usage** There is no library being explicitly used in this benchmark. However, the `Document` object and its methods (`createElement()` and `append()`) are part of the HTML5 API, which is a standard JavaScript library. **Special JS feature/syntax** None are mentioned in the provided information. **Benchmark result explanation** The latest benchmark results show that: 1. The "append - simple" test has an execution rate of 249792.9375 executions per second. 2. The "append - array" test has a significantly lower execution rate of 89946.171875 executions per second, indicating that appending elements to the `body` element using an array is slower in this benchmark. This result suggests that creating and appending individual elements can be faster than passing an array of elements to the `append()` method for this specific use case. However, it's essential to note that performance differences between these approaches may vary depending on the specific requirements and constraints of your application. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to consider when adding elements to an HTML document include: 1. Using a templating engine or a library like React or Angular, which provide more efficient ways to update the DOM. 2. Using CSS Grid or Flexbox to layout content instead of appending elements to the `body`. 3. Batch-processing multiple append operations together using Web Worker threads or other parallel computing techniques. Keep in mind that these alternatives may introduce additional complexity or dependencies, so it's essential to evaluate their trade-offs and suitability for your specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
prepend
Array Push vs pointer
Concat vs push(...) for large arrays 3
Insert new Item on specific Index v2
Append array to array: destructuring push vs for-each push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?