Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and analyze the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark compares two approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. The traditional `concat()` method 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) **Options compared:** * `Array.prototype.concat()`: a built-in method that concatenates two or more arrays. * Spread operator (`...`): a syntax introduced in ES6 (and later) that allows elements to be concatenated into an array. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * `Array.prototype.concat()` + Pros: - Widely supported across browsers - Can handle large amounts of data efficiently + Cons: - Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array object - May not perform well on very large arrays * Spread operator (`...`) + Pros: - Can be faster than `concat()` for small to medium-sized arrays - Can be more concise and readable in many cases + Cons: - Not widely supported across older browsers (prior to ES6) - May not work as expected with certain types of data (e.g., null, undefined) **Library/Function used:** In the provided benchmark, no external library or function is used. The `concat()` method and spread operator are built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS feature/syntax:** The benchmark uses a special syntax introduced in ES6: the spread operator (`...`). This allows elements to be concatenated into an array without creating a new array object using `Array.prototype.concat()`. **Other considerations:** * Performance: The benchmark shows that the spread operator is faster than the traditional `concat()` method for this specific test case. * Code readability: While the spread operator can be more concise, it may not be as readable in all cases. Some developers may prefer the explicitness of the `concat()` method. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to concatenate arrays, consider: * Using `Array.prototype.push()`: while this approach is generally slower than using `concat()` or spread operators, it can still be a viable option in some cases. * Using a library like Lodash, which provides a more functional programming style for working with arrays and has optimized implementations for performance. Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array push vs spread when reducing over results
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?