Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Double tilde vs Math.floor 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
~~ vs Math.floor
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
~~
~~(1000 / 200)
Math.floor
Math.floor(1000 / 200)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
~~
Math.floor
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested, along with the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two test cases: 1. `~~(1000 / 200)` 2. `Math.floor(1000 / 200)` Both test cases perform a simple arithmetic operation: dividing 1000 by 200 and then performing the negation of the result using either the tilde operator (`~~`) or the `Math.floor` function. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Tilde Operator (`~~`)**: The tilde operator is a bitwise NOT operator that first performs a signed integer comparison between its operands and then flips the bits of the result. 2. **Math.floor Function**: The `Math.floor` function returns the largest (closest to negative infinity) value less than or equal to the given number. **Pros and Cons** * **Tilde Operator (`~~`)**: + Pros: Simple, lightweight, and likely to be optimized by JavaScript engines. + Cons: May not behave as expected in all cases, especially when dealing with floating-point numbers. Additionally, its behavior can vary between implementations (e.g., some versions of Chrome may optimize it differently). * **Math.floor Function**: + Pros: Widely supported, well-documented, and less prone to surprises compared to the tilde operator. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to function calls. **Other Considerations** When comparing these two options, it's essential to consider the following: * The tilde operator is designed for bitwise operations, whereas `Math.floor` is a mathematical function. This difference in nature might affect performance and accuracy. * The JavaScript engine may optimize or implement the tilde operator differently compared to the `Math.floor` function. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no libraries involved in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the tilde operator can be used with bitwise operations, but in this case, it seems to be used for a signed integer comparison. **Additional Context** The benchmark is likely intended to compare the performance of different JavaScript engines (in this case, Chrome) when performing arithmetic operations using various operators. The results will help users understand which approach is faster and more efficient. If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, consider the following: * **Other Arithmetic Operators**: You could add additional test cases comparing `>>>`, `<<`, or other arithmetic operators to see how they perform. * **Rounding Functions**: Adding tests for rounding functions like `Math.round()` or `Number.EPSILON` could provide insights into the behavior of floating-point operations in different engines. * **Bitwise Operations**: You could also add test cases comparing bitwise AND, OR, XOR, and shift operators to understand their performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() vs Math.floorfaster test
Rounding to precision
floor vs bitwise-not
floor() vs trunc() vs bitwise hacks (~~, >> 0, etc) 2
Number constructor vs double tilde
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?