Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
triple equal vs bitwise xor
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
=== vs ^
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var number = 12
Tests:
===
number === 12
^
number ^ 12
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
===
^
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, along with the pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Overview** The current benchmark tests two expressions involving the `number` variable, which is initialized to 12. The goal is to determine how many executions per second each expression can handle. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Triangular comparison (`===`)**: This option compares the value of `number` with 12 using the equality operator. 2. **Bitwise XOR operation (`^`)**: This option uses the bitwise XOR operator to perform a binary operation on `number` and 12. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Triangular comparison (`===`):** Pros: * Easy to read and understand * Well-supported by most browsers Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of comparing values * May not be suitable for very large numbers or performance-critical code **Bitwise XOR operation (`^`):** Pros: * Can be faster, as it's a bitwise operation that can be optimized by some compilers * Some hardware architectures may have special instructions for performing XOR operations Cons: * Less intuitive and less readable due to its unconventional use of XOR * May not work correctly with certain data types or values **Other Considerations** * The `number` variable is initialized to 12, which is a relatively small value. As the input value increases, the performance difference between these two approaches may become more significant. * The benchmark only runs on Chrome 107 and Windows desktop platforms. **Library Used (if any)** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries or dependencies. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The test case uses a special syntax for bitwise XOR operation (`^`), which is not commonly used in JavaScript. However, it's worth noting that this syntax is valid in JavaScript and can be used to perform bit manipulation operations. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for measuring performance could include: 1. **Using a different programming language or framework**, such as C++ or Rust, which might provide better performance characteristics. 2. **Implementing custom benchmarking libraries**, such as `Benchmark.js` or `Fastest`, that can handle more complex scenarios and provide more detailed results. 3. **Using cloud-based benchmarking services**, like AWS Benchmarking or Google Benchmark, that offer automated testing and comparison capabilities. Overall, the current benchmark provides a simple and well-controlled test case for comparing the performance of triangular comparison and bitwise XOR operations in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
bitwise operator vs. boolean logic when using TypedArrays
Math.imul vs. polyfills
Math.imul vs. polyfills 2
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() vs bitwise, also trunc, floor
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?