Benchmark: testest - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.5.3/angular.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var ment = angular.module('ent', []);
	ment.controller('EntCtrl', function($compile,$scope) {
	  window.compileE = compileE;
	  function compileE(code) {
	    var scope = $scope.$new();
	    $compile(code)(scope);
	    scope.$destroy();
	  }
	});
	eMent = angular.element('<div><div ng-controller="EntCtrl"></div></div>');
	angular.element(document.body).append(eMent);
	angular.bootstrap(eMent[0], ['ent']);

Tests:

ng
window.compileE('<div ng-click="click()"></div>');
native
window.compileE('<div onclick="click()"></div>');
ngx
window.compileE('<div ng-click="click()"></div>');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
ng
native
ngx

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition consists of two main parts:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: This code sets up an AngularJS module named 'ent' with a controller called 'EntCtrl'. The `compileE` function is defined inside the controller, which takes a string of HTML code as input and compiles it using the `$compile` service. The compiled HTML is then stored in the `scope` variable.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: This code includes the AngularJS library via a script tag.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **ng**: This test case uses the `ng-click` attribute to trigger an event when clicked.
2. **native**: This test case uses the `onclick` attribute instead of the `ng-click` attribute.
3. **ngx**: This test case is similar to the `ng` test case, but it's not clear what difference it makes since both use `ng-click`.

**Options Compared**

The three test cases compare different ways of triggering an event when clicked:

* `ng-click`: An AngularJS-specific syntax for binding a function to a click event.
* `onclick`: A native JavaScript syntax for binding a function to a click event.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **ng-click**: Pros:
	+ Native AngularJS support, which can lead to better performance and less overhead.
	+ Can be used in conjunction with other AngularJS features like two-way data binding.
* Cons:
	+ Requires the use of an AngularJS module, which may add overhead for non-Angular projects.
* **onclick**: Pros:
	+ Native JavaScript syntax, which can lead to better performance and less overhead.
	+ Does not require an additional framework or module.
* Cons:
	+ May not be as expressive or flexible as `ng-click`, especially when working with complex event handlers.

**Library and Purpose**

The AngularJS library is used in this benchmark to provide the `$compile` service, which is responsible for compiling HTML templates into functions that can be executed on a scope. The purpose of using AngularJS here is likely to demonstrate its performance characteristics in compiling HTML code.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None are explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON, but it's worth noting that `ng-click` and `onclick` both use event handling syntax that is specific to JavaScript and not as widely supported as other languages.

Related benchmarks:

testest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: ng vs native vs ngx

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

ng

native

ngx

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):