Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
rzegtytreh
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
splice vs filter
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
splice
const arr = [1, 2, 3] const newArr = [...arr] newArr.splice(1, 1)
filter
const arr = [1, 2, 3] const newArr = arr.filter((num) => num === 1)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
splice
filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. "splice" * The benchmark definition code: `const arr = [1, 2, 3]\r\nconst newArr = [...arr]\r\nnewArr.splice(1, 1)` * This code creates an array `arr` with three elements and then uses the spread operator to create a new array `newArr`. Finally, it removes the second element from `newArr` using the `splice` method. 2. "filter" * The benchmark definition code: `const arr = [1, 2, 3]\r\nconst newArr = arr.filter((num) => num === 1)` * This code creates an array `arr` with three elements and then uses the `filter` method to create a new array `newArr`. The filter function keeps only the elements where the number is equal to 1. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare different approaches for performing common JavaScript operations: 1. Array manipulation using `splice` vs. using `filter`. 2. Using spread operator (`...`) vs. creating a new array from scratch using other methods (e.g., `Array.from()`). **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using `splice`**: This approach is simple and efficient for removing elements from an array, but it can be slow if the array is large. * Pros: Simple to implement, fast for small arrays. * Cons: Can be slow for large arrays, modifies the original array. 2. **Using `filter`**: This approach creates a new array with only the desired elements and leaves the original array unchanged. * Pros: Preserves the original array, efficient for large arrays. * Cons: Can be slower than `splice`, uses more memory. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This approach creates a new array by copying elements from an existing array. * Pros: Fast and efficient, preserves the original array. * Cons: Requires JavaScript 7+, can be slower for very large arrays. **Other Alternatives** 1. `Array.prototype.map()` or `Array.prototype.reduce()`: These methods could also be used to filter or manipulate arrays, but they might have different performance characteristics. 2. Library-specific implementations (e.g., Lodash's `_.filter()`, _.range): These libraries provide optimized implementations of common algorithms, which can be useful in certain situations. **Library Usage** The test cases do not explicitly use any external libraries, but they may rely on the built-in JavaScript features and methods mentioned above.
Related benchmarks:
Stardust memoized
Stardust variables
Rafa speed test 1
tmpcanvas
tmpcanvas2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?