Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Diff miliseconds
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Date - Date.now() vs Date.getTime() - Date.now() vs Date.parse() - Date.now()
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Date - Date.now()
const a = new Date(Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")) - Date.now()
Date.getTime() - Date.now()
const b = new Date(Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")).getTime() - Date.now()
Date.parse() - Date.now()
const c = Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z") - Date.now()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Date - Date.now()
Date.getTime() - Date.now()
Date.parse() - Date.now()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different ways to calculate the difference between two dates in JavaScript, which are: 1. Using the `Date` constructor with a string parsing argument (`new Date(Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")) - Date.now()`). 2. Using the `getTime()` method of the `Date` object (`new Date(Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")).getTime() - Date.now()`). 3. Using the `parse()` method without creating a new `Date` object (`Date.parse("2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z") - Date.now()`). **Options Comparison:** * **Option 1 (New Date with parsing):** This method creates a new `Date` object using the provided string, and then subtracts the current time (`Date.now()`) from it. + Pros: - It's a straightforward way to calculate the difference between two dates. + Cons: - Creating a new `Date` object can be expensive in terms of performance. * **Option 2 (getTime() method):** This method calls the `getTime()` method on an existing `Date` object created using the `Date` constructor, and then subtracts the current time (`Date.now()`). + Pros: - It avoids creating a new `Date` object, which can be more efficient. + Cons: - It requires creating an intermediate `Date` object, which can still incur some overhead. * **Option 3 (parse() method without Date creation):** This method directly calls the `parse()` method on the global `Date` object, and then subtracts the current time (`Date.now()`). + Pros: - It avoids creating a new `Date` object altogether. + Cons: - The `parse()` method can be slower due to its implementation details. **Library Considerations:** The benchmark uses the `Date` object and its methods, which is built-in to JavaScript. No external libraries are required. **Special JS Features or Syntax:** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark beyond what's normally available in modern JavaScript implementations. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives for calculating date differences include: * Using the `DateInterval` class from a library like Moment.js, which provides more advanced date manipulation capabilities. * Utilizing a third-party library like Date-Fns, which offers optimized and efficient date arithmetic functions. * Implementing custom date arithmetic functions using bitwise operations or other low-level techniques. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these alternatives may be negligible for simple use cases, but can become significant when dealing with large datasets or high-performance applications.
Related benchmarks:
Division by 1000 vs bitwise shifting approximation (1024)
moment vs custom
luxon.fromSeconds(seconds) vs Date(seconds * 1000)
new Date vs custom method
parseInt-vs-math.floor2agasdsgsa
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?