Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
new Map vs Spread
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread vs new map
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var cpcodes = new Array(100000).fill(undefined).map((_,i) => `${i}`); var selectionsMap = new Map([ [ 'dateRange', [ 'custom' ] ], [ 'start', [ '2022-04-01T00:00:00Z' ] ], [ 'end', [ '2022-04-08T00:00:00Z' ] ], [ 'timezone', [ 'Europe/Warsaw' ] ], [ 'network', [ 'mobile' ] ], [ 'string_match_options', [ 'start_with' ] ], [ 'cpcodes', cpcodes ] ]); var selectionsObject = { dateRange: [ 'custom' ], start: [ '2022-04-01T00:00:00Z' ], end: [ '2022-04-08T00:00:00Z' ], timezone: [ 'Europe/Warsaw' ], network: [ 'mobile' ], string_match_options: [ 'start_with' ], cpcodes: cpcodes }
Tests:
spread
let a = { ...selectionsObject, network: [ 'non_mobile' ] };
new map
selectionsMap.set('network', [ 'non_mobile' ]); let a = new Map(selectionsMap);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread
new map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The provided benchmark definition represents two different approaches for creating an object `a` based on another object `selectionsObject`. The main difference between these approaches lies in how they handle the `network` property. **Approach 1: Using Spread Operator (`"spread"`)** In this approach, a new object `a` is created by spreading the `selectionsObject` and modifying the `network` property: ```javascript let a = { ...selectionsObject, network: [ 'non_mobile' ] }; ``` **Pros:** * Easy to read and write * Creates a new object with all properties from `selectionsObject`, including `network` **Cons:** * Can be slower due to the creation of a new object **Approach 2: Using `Map` (`"new map"`)** In this approach, a new `Map` is created using the `selectionsMap` object and then converted to an object: ```javascript let a = new Map(selectionsMap).get('network'); ``` However, according to the provided benchmark definition, the correct code should be: ```javascript let a = new Map([['network', [ 'non_mobile' ]]]).get('network'); ``` **Pros:** * Can be faster due to the efficient use of `Map` data structure **Cons:** * Less intuitive and may require more boilerplate code In general, using `Map` can be beneficial when you need to efficiently store and retrieve key-value pairs. However, in this specific case, creating a new object with the modified `network` property might be easier to read and write. The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches on different browsers and devices. **Library Used** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. The use of `Map` data structure is part of the ECMAScript standard, so it's not a custom library. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None of the test cases explicitly uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, using `let a = { ...selectionsObject, network: [ 'non_mobile' ] };` might be considered a more modern JavaScript feature, as it uses object destructuring and spread operator. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to create an object with a modified `network` property, some possible options include: * Using a library like Lodash or underscore.js, which provide functions for working with objects and arrays. * Creating a new object using the `Object.assign()` method: ```javascript let a = Object.assign({}, selectionsObject, { network: [ 'non_mobile' ] }); ``` However, keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics compared to the original approaches.
Related benchmarks:
testing performance for dates
dsdsdsdsdsdsds
simple stuff
ISO 8601 parsing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?