Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
For with variable 3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.arr = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => i)
Tests:
1
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { console.log(i); }
2
for (let i = 0, maxLength = arr.length; i < maxLength; i++) { console.log(i) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, which is a small piece of code designed to measure the performance of specific JavaScript features or syntax. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. **For with variable 3**: This benchmark defines a simple `for` loop that iterates over an array using a variable `i`. The array is created in the `Script Preparation Code` section using `Array.from()`. 2. **For with variable and condition 4**: This benchmark also uses a `for` loop, but it introduces a new feature: using a variable `maxLength` to conditionally update the loop's iterations. **Comparison of Options** The two benchmarks compare different approaches to iterating over an array: 1. Using a fixed length variable (`i < arr.length; i++`) 2. Using a conditional expression with a variable and a length (`i < maxLength; i++`) Pros and Cons of each approach: * **Fixed length variable**: + Pros: Simple, easy to read. + Cons: May not be optimal for large arrays or performance-critical code. * **Conditional expression with variable and length**: + Pros: More efficient for large arrays, can handle dynamic lengths. + Cons: May require more complex understanding of the syntax. In terms of performance, the second benchmark (using a conditional expression) is likely to perform better on larger arrays or in performance-critical code. **Library Usage** There are no explicit libraries mentioned in the provided JSON. However, `Array.from()` is used to create an array, which is a built-in JavaScript method introduced in ES6. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The use of template literals (`\r\n`) and variable declarations (`let`, `const`, `var`) is not specific to this benchmark. It's general-purpose JavaScript syntax features. **Other Alternatives** If the goal is to measure the performance of different array iteration approaches, other alternatives could include: * Using a `for...of` loop instead of a traditional `for` loop * Using a custom iterator or generator function to iterate over the array * Using a third-party library like `iteratee` or `lodash.each` However, these alternatives would likely require additional setup and configuration, whereas the provided benchmark JSON provides a simple and straightforward comparison between two existing JavaScript approaches.
Related benchmarks:
Array: get last item
For with variable
set vs some 1000000
For Loop Leng Inside and Outside
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?