Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Average js vs ._mean
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Javascript vs lodash
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
array = [1,54,23,213,4,6,7,8,5,23,542,3];
Tests:
Javascript
function average(nums) { return nums.reduce((a, b) => (a + b)) / nums.length; } average(array);
lodash
_.mean(array);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Javascript
lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two JavaScript functions: `average` and `_mean`. The `average` function calculates the average of an array of numbers using the `reduce()` method, while the `_mean` function is a part of the Lodash library, which provides a generic implementation of the mean calculation. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: 1. **Native JavaScript**: Using the built-in `average` function. 2. **Lodash**: Using the `_mean` function from the Lodash library. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Native JavaScript (Average)** Pros: * Fast execution since it's a native function, optimized for performance. * Easy to understand and implement. Cons: * Requires the `reduce()` method, which might be slower than other methods in certain situations. * Not as widely used or supported as Lodash. **Lodash (_mean)** Pros: * Faster execution since it's implemented in C++, which is a compiled language that can produce faster results. * Wider adoption and support across different browsers and environments. * Provides additional features, such as handling edge cases and providing a way to get the median or weighted mean. Cons: * Requires an external library (Lodash), which might add overhead due to the download and parsing time. * Might be slower than native implementations for specific use cases. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is critical, Lodash's C++ implementation might provide a slight advantage. However, the difference might not be significant in most scenarios. * Code complexity: Native JavaScript requires understanding the `reduce()` method and its nuances, while Lodash provides an easy-to-use interface for calculating the mean. * Maintenance and support: If you need to maintain your codebase or use it across different environments, native JavaScript might be a better choice since it's built-in and widely supported. **Lodash Library** The `_mean` function in Lodash is part of the `lodash.commons.math` module. It provides a generic implementation for calculating the mean (average) of an array, which can handle various edge cases, such as empty arrays or arrays with only one element. The library is widely used and maintained by the Lodash team. **No Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark, so I won't elaborate on them. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or implementations for calculating the mean, consider: * `Math.mean()` (built-in JavaScript method): Similar to Lodash's `_mean` function but might be slower due to its dynamic nature. * `Array.prototype.reduce()` (native JavaScript method): A more lightweight implementation of the reduce() method, which can be used to calculate the mean. * Other libraries like Moment.js or Mathjs: These libraries provide additional mathematical functions and might offer alternative implementations for calculating the mean. Keep in mind that the performance difference between these alternatives might be negligible unless you're dealing with extremely large datasets.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash sort vs array.prototype.slice and array.prototype.sort
Lodash sortBy vs array.prototype.sort primitive
Lodash sortBy vs array.prototype.sort primitive arr int
Lodash 4.17.21 sort vs array.prototype.sort
Lodash sort vs array.prototype.slice + array.prototype.sort
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?