Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty vs bool vs Object.hasOwn
(version: 0)
Object lookup performance
Comparing performance of:
undefined vs typeof vs in vs hasOwnProperty vs bool vs Object.hasOwn
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f:6, g:7 };
Tests:
undefined
obj.d !== undefined;
typeof
typeof obj.d !== 'undefined';
in
'd' in obj;
hasOwnProperty
obj.hasOwnProperty( 'd' );
bool
!! obj.d;
Object.hasOwn
Object.hasOwn(obj, 'd')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
undefined
typeof
in
hasOwnProperty
bool
Object.hasOwn
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its various components. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of different JavaScript operators when used to check if a property exists or has a certain value in an object. The comparison is made between: 1. `undefined` (using `obj.d !== undefined`) 2. `typeof` (checking if `obj.d` has a certain type, e.g., number) 3. `in` (using the `in` operator to check if a property exists) 4. `hasOwnProperty` (using the `hasOwnProperty` method to check if a property is owned by the object) 5. `bool` (using a boolean cast (`!! obj.d`) to check if a value is truthy or falsy) 6. `Object.hasOwn` (using the `Object.hasOwn` method to check if an object has a certain property) **Library and Purpose** * `hasOwnProperty`: A built-in JavaScript method that checks if an object has a certain property as its own property, rather than inheriting it from its prototype chain. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None of the benchmark cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, promises, or arrow functions. All comparisons are made using standard JavaScript operators and methods. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of each operator in different contexts: 1. Checking if a property exists (`in` vs `hasOwnProperty`) 2. Checking if a value is truthy or falsy (`bool` vs other approaches) 3. Using `typeof` to check the type of a property **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here's a brief overview of each approach: 1. **`in` operator**: Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported. Cons: May not work as expected in some cases (e.g., when using `in` with `Object.prototype`), and its behavior can be nuanced. 2. **`hasOwnProperty` method**: Pros: More precise control over the check, especially when dealing with inherited properties. Cons: Method call overhead and potential performance impact. 3. **Boolean casting (`!! obj.d`)**: Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported (though it may not work as expected if `obj.d` is a negative number). Cons: May be less intuitive than other approaches, and its behavior can be nuanced. 4. **`typeof` operator**: Pros: Fast and accurate for checking type, but may not work well with complex types or objects. Cons: Less intuitive and potentially more error-prone. **Other Alternatives** If the `in` operator is too slow or unpredictable, other alternatives could include: 1. `Object.keys(obj).includes('d')`: This method uses the `keys()` method to get an array of property names and then checks if `'d'` is included. 2. `obj['d'] !== undefined`: This approach uses the bracket notation to access the property directly, which may be faster but also more brittle. However, these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or trade-offs in terms of simplicity and accuracy. Keep in mind that the specific choice of operator depends on the use case and requirements. The benchmark results should provide a general indication of each approach's relative performance.
Related benchmarks:
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 2
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty big object
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty for non-existing property
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?