Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Convert string to number
(version: 0)
Perform string number to number type
Comparing performance of:
+ vs parseInt
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
+
let converted = +'100'
parseInt
let converted = parseInt('100')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
+
parseInt
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 days ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 147 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
+
91858352.0 Ops/sec
parseInt
94384544.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is to measure the performance of converting a string to a number. There are two approaches: 1. Using the unary plus operator (`+`) 2. Using the `parseInt()` function **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: * **Unary Plus Operator (`+`)**: This method directly converts the string to an integer by adding it to zero. * **parseInt() Function**: This method also converts the string to a number, but with more flexibility (e.g., allowing for decimal numbers and handling leading zeros). **Pros and Cons** 1. **Unary Plus Operator (`+`)**: * Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported across browsers. * Cons: Can lead to precision issues if the input string contains decimal points or scientific notation. 2. **parseInt() Function**: * Pros: More flexible, handles leading zeros, and can convert strings with decimal points or scientific notation. * Cons: May be slower due to the parsing process. **Library and Purpose** None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that `parseInt()` is a built-in JavaScript function, so no additional library is required. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The test cases do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's necessary for the benchmarks. **Other Alternatives** For converting strings to numbers, other approaches could include: * Using the `Number()` function (a synonym for `parseInt()` in some browsers) * Using a regular expression to extract and parse the numeric value from the string * Using a library like Moment.js for handling date and time conversions Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional dependencies or complexity. **Benchmark Preparation Code** Since there is no preparation code provided, it's likely that the benchmark framework will handle initialization and setup automatically. Overall, this benchmark compares two simple but common approaches to converting strings to numbers. Understanding the trade-offs between speed, precision, and flexibility can help developers choose the best approach for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
To Formatted Number
Number Conversion Speed
Format number | Regex vs Code V1.1
Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString vs Custom Formatter vs Pre-created Intl formatter
Compare String to Number conversion
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?