Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
startsWith vs === 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
startsWith vs ===
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
startsWith
'pseudo-class'.startsWith('pseudo')
===
'pseudo-class' === 'pseudo-class'
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
startsWith
===
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition with two test cases: 1. `pseudo-class.startsWith('pseudo')` 2. `pseudo-class === 'pseudo-class'` Both test cases compare the result of calling the `startsWith` method on an object called `pseudo-class` with two different strings. **Options Compared:** In these test cases, we're comparing the performance of two options: 1. `startsWith`: a string method that checks if a specified value starts at the beginning of the current string. 2. `===`: a strict equality operator that checks for both value and type equality. **Pros and Cons:** * **`startsWith`:** * Pros: * More intuitive for most use cases, as it stops checking once it reaches the end of the string. * Less CPU-intensive than `===`, since it only needs to traverse a portion of the string. * Cons: * May be slower for very long strings or when the substring is not found at the beginning, since it requires additional checks. * `===`: * Pros: * Faster for simple equality checks, as it can use caching and is less CPU-intensive. * More suitable for certain use cases where type checking is essential (e.g., when working with primitive types). * Cons: * Less intuitive, since it performs both value and type checks. **Library and Purpose:** In the provided test case, no specific library is mentioned. However, JavaScript's built-in `String.prototype.startsWith()` method is used, which returns a boolean indicating whether the specified value starts at the beginning of the current string. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark definition. It primarily focuses on comparing the performance of the `startsWith` method versus the strict equality operator (`===`).
Related benchmarks:
startsWith vs string array
String indexOf vs startsWith/endsWith
Js Search - String StartsWith vs Includes
String indexOf() === 0 vs. startsWith()
startsWith vs charCodeAt
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?