Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Set any value as string attribute
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Plain vs Constructor vs Concat vs Template vs toString
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var element = document.createElement('a'); var url = 'https://example.com';
Tests:
Plain
element.setAttribute('href', url);
Constructor
element.setAttribute('href', String(url));
Concat
element.setAttribute('href', '' + url);
Template
element.setAttribute('href', `${url}`);
toString
element.setAttribute('href', url.toString());
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Plain
Constructor
Concat
Template
toString
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a single test case that can be run by MeasureThat.net. In this case, we have five test cases: 1. "Set any value as string attribute" 2. "Plain" (setting `href` attribute directly without concatenation or template literals) 3. "Constructor" (using the `String()` function to convert the value before setting the attribute) 4. "Concat" (concatenating a string literal with the value using the `+` operator) 5. "Template" (using template literals (`${}`) to create the string) **Options Compared** The five test cases compare different approaches to set the `href` attribute of an HTML element: * **Plain**: Directly setting the attribute without any additional operations. * **Constructor**: Using the `String()` function to convert the value before setting the attribute. This is equivalent to concatenating a string literal with an empty string, but uses a more explicit approach. * **Concat**: Concatenating a string literal with the value using the `+` operator. * **Template**: Using template literals (`${}`) to create the string. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Plain**: Simple and efficient, as it doesn't introduce any additional operations. * Pros: Fastest execution time * Cons: May not be readable or maintainable for complex cases 2. **Constructor**: Uses a more explicit approach to convert the value, which can improve readability. * Pros: More readable, less prone to errors due to implicit type conversions * Cons: May be slower than direct concatenation 3. **Concat**: Concatenates a string literal with the value using the `+` operator. * Pros: Fast execution time and low memory usage * Cons: May lead to performance issues if the concatenated strings are large 4. **Template**: Uses template literals (`${}`) to create the string. * Pros: Readable, efficient, and concise syntax * Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments **Special JS Features/ Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** In general, other alternatives for setting attributes in HTML elements include: * Using the `innerHTML` property instead of `href` * Using a DOM library like jQuery to simplify attribute manipulation * Using a templating engine like Handlebars or Mustache to create dynamic templates However, these alternatives are not specific to this benchmark and are not being compared in the provided test cases.
Related benchmarks:
DocumentFragment append VS Normal append
setAttribute vs assignment (=)
getAttribute vs get property (.)
getRelativeUrl
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?