Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
variable vs call index
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
call index vs variable
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
call index
let arr=[1,2,3,4,5] console.log(arr[3])
variable
let arr=[1,2,3,4,5] let i=arr[3] console.log(i)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
call index
variable
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript script that creates an array `arr` with five elements and logs the fourth element (`arr[3]`) to the console using two different approaches: 1. **Call Index**: The script uses the call index operator (`[]`) to access the element, as in `console.log(arr[3])`. 2. **Variable**: The script creates a variable `i` and assigns it the value of the fourth element, then logs `i` to the console, as in `console.log(i)`. **Options Compared:** The benchmark is comparing two different approaches: 1. **Call Index**: Directly accessing the array element using the call index operator (`[]`). 2. **Variable**: Creating a variable and assigning it the value of the array element. **Pros and Cons:** * **Call Index**: + Pros: Simple, efficient, and widely supported. + Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable for complex data access patterns. * **Variable**: + Pros: More explicit, easier to understand, and more flexible for complex data access scenarios. + Cons: Requires additional memory allocation and may incur a small performance overhead. **Library/Utility Used:** None. This benchmark does not use any external libraries or utilities. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives:** If the test cases were to be modified, alternative approaches could include: * Using a loop to iterate over the array elements instead of accessing them directly using the call index operator. * Using a different data structure, such as an object or a map, instead of an array. * Adding additional logging statements or instrumentation to measure performance in more detail. It's worth noting that MeasureThat.net is designed to focus on measuring performance differences between different JavaScript implementations and runtime environments, so the simplicity and minimalism of this benchmark are likely intentional design choices.
Related benchmarks:
Spread operator vs apply
Spread operator vs apply vs apply undefined. length 6
Direct call vs bind vs call vs apply (with precreated arg variables)
ref?.current? vs ref.current? when current = null
Spread operator vs apply - realistic
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?