Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
+= vs templateString ...
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
+= vs template
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
rc = {regex: /^\s*(\S+)\s+(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})\s+([a-f\d\.]+)\s+(\d+)/i}
Tests:
+=
let flags = rc.regex.flags; flags += !rc.regex.multiline ? 'm' : ''; // adding multiline if not flags += !rc.regex.global ? 'g' : ''; // adding global if not console.log(flags)
template
flags = `${rc.regex.flags}${!rc.regex.multiline ? 'm' : ''}${!rc.regex.global ? 'g' : ''}`; console.log(flags);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
+=
template
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and provide an analysis of the different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined in two parts: `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`. The `Script Preparation Code` defines a regular expression pattern `rc.regex` with flags that can be modified by the test cases. The `Html Preparation Code` is empty, which means no HTML preparation code is required for this benchmark. **Options Compared** Two options are compared in this benchmark: 1. **+= Operator**: This approach uses the `+=` operator to concatenate a string and modify the `flags` variable. 2. **Template String**: This approach uses template strings (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) to format the `flags` variable. **Pros and Cons** Here's an analysis of each approach: ### += Operator Pros: * Widely supported by most JavaScript engines * Easy to understand and implement for developers familiar with C-style programming languages * Fast performance, as it involves simple arithmetic operations Cons: * Can lead to less readable code if not used carefully * May have issues with string concatenation performance due to the creation of temporary strings * Can be slower than template strings in some cases ### Template String Pros: * More concise and readable code * Supports formatting of numbers, dates, and other types of data * Good performance, as it involves fewer operations compared to `+=` Cons: * Less widely supported by older JavaScript engines (pre-ES2015) * May be slower than the `+=` operator in some cases due to the creation of a new string object **Library/Functionality** None of these approaches use any external libraries or functions. The regular expression pattern is defined within the script preparation code. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** Neither approach uses any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, arrow functions, or generators. **Other Considerations** The benchmark measures the execution speed of both approaches by executing each test case multiple times and calculating the total number of executions per second. The results provide a comparison of the performance of these two approaches in a controlled environment. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to this benchmark, consider using other JavaScript benchmarking tools or frameworks that can help you compare the performance of different code snippets or functions, such as: * jsperf: A popular JavaScript performance benchmarking tool * Benchmark.js: A modern JavaScript benchmarking library * JSPerf2: An updated version of jsperf with improved features and support for newer browsers Keep in mind that the choice of benchmarking tool or framework depends on your specific use case, target audience, and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
format string
Regexp creation vs memoization
Literal regexp's vs string and array methods
Precompile RegExp vs Runtime (on the fly)
Regex tests Dani
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?