Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Create Element v2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla JS with jQuery vs Jquery vs Pure Vanilla
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
Tests:
Vanilla JS with jQuery
var el = $(document.createElement('div'));
Jquery
var el = $('<div>');
Pure Vanilla
var el = document.createElement('div');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla JS with jQuery
Jquery
Pure Vanilla
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the JavaScript code to be executed in each test case. In this case, there is only one benchmark definition with an empty "Description" field and no "Script Preparation Code". The HTML preparation code includes a link to jQuery library, which is loaded dynamically before running the JavaScript tests. **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Vanilla JS with jQuery**: This option uses the `jQuery` library to create an element. 2. **JQuery**: This option uses only the `jQuery` library to create an element. 3. **Pure Vanilla**: This option creates an element without using any external libraries, relying on native JavaScript methods. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Vanilla JS with jQuery**: * Pros: Simplifies element creation and provides a more straightforward way to work with DOM elements. * Cons: Introduces additional overhead due to the jQuery library, which may impact performance. 2. **JQuery**: * Pros: Provides an efficient way to manipulate DOM elements and has built-in features like event handling and animation capabilities. * Cons: May introduce additional dependencies and overhead compared to native JavaScript methods. 3. **Pure Vanilla**: * Pros: Optimizes performance by not introducing any external library overhead, allowing for direct manipulation of DOM elements using native JavaScript methods. * Cons: Requires more code and expertise to create elements correctly. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversal, event handling, and DOM manipulation. It provides a consistent interface across different browsers and versions. In the context of this benchmark, jQuery is used to load dynamically before running the JavaScript tests. **Special JS Feature/Syntax (not applicable in this case)** Since there are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested, we can skip this explanation. **Other Alternatives** If you need alternatives for creating elements without using jQuery, consider: * **DOMTraversals**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that allows traversing the DOM tree. You can use it to create elements from scratch. * **createElement**, **appendChild**, and other native methods: These are basic DOM element creation methods that don't rely on any external libraries. However, keep in mind that these alternatives might be less efficient or more cumbersome than using jQuery. Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of three different approaches to creating elements with JavaScript. It allows users to see the performance differences between vanilla JavaScript, jQuery, and pure vanilla JavaScript methods.
Related benchmarks:
JS v JQ
create element test
Vergleich
Create Element v1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?