Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Body Test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
query vs body
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
query
document.querySelector('body').scrollHeight;
body
document.body.scrollHeight;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
query
body
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark data to understand what is being tested and the different approaches being compared. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides two test cases: 1. `document.querySelector('body').scrollHeight;` 2. `document.body.scrollHeight;` Both tests aim to measure the performance of JavaScript code that interacts with HTML elements, specifically those related to scrolling. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: A) Using `document.querySelector('body')` followed by `scrollHeight`: B) Using `document.body.scrollHeight` directly **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Option A: Using `document.querySelector('body')` followed by `scrollHeight`** Pros: * This approach allows for a more explicit separation of concerns, making it easier to understand the code being executed. * The `scrollHeight` property is only accessed after the element has been queried, which might reduce unnecessary computations. Cons: * This approach may incur additional overhead due to the query operation, potentially affecting performance. * The use of `querySelector` can introduce additional complexity and potential browser-specific variations (e.g., different selectors used by Chrome vs. Firefox). **Option B: Using `document.body.scrollHeight` directly** Pros: * This approach eliminates the need for an explicit query operation, reducing overhead and simplifying the code execution path. * Direct access to `scrollHeight` may be faster since it doesn't require a separate query step. Cons: * This approach mixes concerns by accessing both the element's inner height (`scrollHeight`) and outer height (`scrollWidth`) in a single statement, making it harder to understand the intent of the code. * It might lead to subtle performance differences or variations across browsers due to differences in how `scrollHeight` is implemented. **Library Usage** Neither test case uses any external libraries. The JavaScript code relies solely on native browser APIs. **Special JS Features or Syntax (None)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark assumes a desktop environment, as indicated by the "Desktop" device platform. * The use of `document.querySelector` and `scrollHeight` suggests that the test is running on a browser with support for these APIs (which is expected for modern browsers like Chrome). * The fact that two different test cases are provided implies that the benchmark is interested in comparing performance across these specific scenarios. **Alternative Benchmarks** Other alternatives might include: 1. Measuring the performance of other DOM-related queries, such as `document.body.offsetWidth` or `document.createElement`. 2. Using a library like jQuery to simplify the DOM query and manipulation process. 3. Comparing the performance of different HTML elements or styles (e.g., using `style.height` instead of `height`). 4. Testing the performance of JavaScript code that interacts with Web Storage or other storage mechanisms. Keep in mind that these alternative benchmarks would require modifications to the existing test setup and might not directly compare with the current implementation.
Related benchmarks:
document.querySelectorAll vs document.body.querySelectorAll
document.querySelectorAll vs document.body.querySelectorAll
document.body vs document.querySelector
document.body vs document.querySelector('body')
document.body vs document.querySelector('body') is performence2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?