Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array has elements
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
length vs length > 0 vs list
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
length
const list = [] if (list.length) return
length > 0
const list = [] if (list.length > 0) return
list
const list = [] if (list) return
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
length
length > 0
list
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into smaller sections to make it easier to understand. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for a JavaScript microbenchmark. Here's what's tested: * The `Name` field specifies the name of the benchmark, which is "Array has elements". * The `Description` field is empty, indicating that no description or context is provided for this benchmark. * The `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` fields are also empty, meaning that no code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark definition contains three individual test cases: 1. `"const list = []\r\nif (list.length) return"` 2. `"const list = []\r\nif (list.length > 0) return"` 3. `"const list = []\r\nif (list) return"` These test cases compare different conditions that are equivalent to checking if an array has elements: * Test case 1: Checks if the length property of an empty array is truthy. * Test case 2: Checks if the length property of an empty array is greater than 0. * Test case 3: Checks if the array itself is truthy. **Options Compared** The three test cases compare different approaches to check if an array has elements: 1. Checking `list.length` (Test case 1) * Pros: + Simple and straightforward * Cons: + Fails for empty arrays with a non-zero length property (e.g., `[0]`) 2. Checking `list.length > 0` (Test case 2) * Pros: + Avoids issues with empty arrays * Cons: + More complex and potentially slower due to the comparison 3. Checking `list` itself (Test case 3) * Pros: + Most efficient and straightforward approach * Cons: + May be considered less readable or maintainable **Library: EmptyArray** The `EmptyArray` class is not explicitly mentioned in the JSON, but it's implied as a potential library that could be used to create empty arrays. The `EmptyArray` class is a part of the JavaScript standard library and provides a way to create an array with no elements. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** The benchmark definition uses JavaScript's truthy/falsy values to compare conditions. Specifically, the `if (list) return` statement uses the fact that an empty array has a falsy value in this context. This is a common pattern in JavaScript and is used extensively throughout the language. **Other Alternatives** There are alternative ways to check if an array has elements: * Using `Array.isArray()` with an empty array: `Array.isArray([])` * Using a conditional statement with a custom function to check for emptiness: `if (isEmpty(list)) return` These alternatives may be more or less efficient depending on the specific use case, but they are viable options. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
set vs array includes
testando 123 teste
checking empty array
set vs array includestratsatsrats
new set vs array includes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?