Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
innerhtml vs removechild vs firstchild.remove
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
innerHTML vs removeChild vs node.firstChild.remove
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="container"></div>
Script Preparation code:
var node = document.getElementById('container'); for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) node.appendChild(document.createElement('div'));
Tests:
innerHTML
var node = document.getElementById('container'); node.innerHTML = '';
removeChild
var node = document.getElementById('container'); while(node.firstChild) node.removeChild(node.firstChild)
node.firstChild.remove
var node = document.getElementById('container'); while(node.firstChild) node.firstChild.remove()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
innerHTML
removeChild
node.firstChild.remove
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
innerHTML
11274576.0 Ops/sec
removeChild
21342806.0 Ops/sec
node.firstChild.remove
21703240.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, library usage, special JS features, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing three different approaches to clear an HTML element: 1. `innerHTML`: setting the `innerHTML` property of the element directly. 2. `removeChild`: removing child nodes from the element using a while loop. 3. `node.firstChild.remove`: removing the first child node of the element and then calling its `remove` method. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is identical for all three test cases, creating an HTML element with the ID "container" and appending 1000 child elements to it using a `for` loop. This ensures that all tests are run on the same DOM structure. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code is also identical for all three test cases, creating a simple HTML element with the ID "container". **Individual Test Cases** Each test case has its own benchmark definition: 1. **innerHTML**: sets `innerHTML` to an empty string. 2. **removeChild**: uses a while loop to remove child nodes from the element until there are no more child nodes left. 3. **node.firstChild.remove**: removes the first child node of the element and then calls its `remove` method. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of each approach: 1. **innerHTML**: * Pros: fast and efficient, as it directly sets the content of the element. * Cons: can be problematic if the element has other attributes or styles that need to be reset, and may not work in all browsers. 2. **removeChild**: * Pros: ensures removal of all child nodes, which can be important for maintaining DOM integrity. * Cons: slower than `innerHTML` due to the loop, and may require more CPU cycles. 3. **node.firstChild.remove**: * Pros: only removes the first child node, which might be sufficient in some cases, and is generally faster than `removeChild`. * Cons: assumes that there's only one child node, and removing it can lead to unexpected behavior if there are multiple nodes. **Library Usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries or frameworks. **Special JS Features** There are no special JS features mentioned in the benchmark. The tests only rely on standard JavaScript syntax and DOM APIs. **Other Considerations** When running this benchmark, it's essential to consider: * Browser support: different browsers may have varying levels of support for these approaches. * Document structure: the performance of each approach can depend on the structure of the document, including the number and type of child nodes. * Resource constraints: the availability of resources (e.g., CPU, memory) can impact performance. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to this benchmark or want to explore other approaches to clearing an HTML element, consider: * Using a library like jQuery that provides methods for manipulating the DOM, such as `empty()`, `html()`, and `children()`. * Implementing your own custom loop-based approach to remove child nodes. * Exploring other methods, such as using `Element.prototype.removeChild()` or `Node.prototype.remove()`. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and might not be suitable for all use cases.
Related benchmarks:
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove vs removeLast
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove! (few child nodes)
innerhtml vs removeChild-firstChild vs removeChild-lastChild
innerHTML vs removeChild(node.firstChild) vs removeChild(node.lastChild)
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove #0000 (No first child)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?