Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Parsing args
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex.test vs indexOf === 1
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var args = [ "ru=http://localhost:9001", "us=http://localhost:9002", "ab=http://localhost:9003", "cd=http://localhost:9004", "ef=http://localhost:9005", "gh=http://localhost:9006", "ih=http://localhost:9007", "kl=http://localhost:9008", "mn=http://localhost:9009", "op=http://localhost:9010", "qr=http://localhost:9011", "st=http://localhost:9012", "uv=http://localhost:9013", "wx=http://localhost:9014", "yz=http://localhost:9015", "aa=http://localhost:9016", "bb=http://localhost:9017", "cc=http://localhost:9018", "dd=http://localhost:9019", "ee=http://localhost:9020", ]
Tests:
Regex.test
var regex = /[a-zA-Z]{2}=.*/ var result = args.filter(_ => regex.test(_)) console.log(result);
indexOf === 1
var result = args.filter(_ => _.indexOf("=") === 1) console.log(result);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex.test
indexOf === 1
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark named "Parsing args". This benchmark measures the performance of two different approaches to parsing command-line arguments in JavaScript. The Script Preparation Code defines an array `args` containing 30 URLs, which will be used as input for the test cases. The Html Preparation Code is empty, indicating that no HTML is involved in this benchmark. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Regex.test**: This approach uses a regular expression to check if each URL contains an equal sign (`=`). The `Regex.test()` method returns a boolean value indicating whether the input string matches the pattern. 2. **indexOf === 1**: This approach uses the `indexOf` method to find the index of the first occurrence of `"="` in each URL and then checks if it's equal to 1. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: * **Regex.test**: + Pros: Can be more efficient than using `indexOf`, as it's implemented in native code. + Cons: May be slower for very large inputs, as regular expressions can be computationally expensive to create and match. * **indexOf === 1**: + Pros: Typically faster than `Regex.test` for simple cases, as it's a built-in method that doesn't require creating a pattern object. + Cons: Can be slower for very large inputs, as it may require scanning the entire string to find the index. **Library and Purpose** In both test cases, no external libraries are used. The `Regex.test` approach relies on JavaScript's native `RegExp` API, while the `indexOf === 1` approach uses a built-in method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in these test cases. They only rely on standard JavaScript methods and operators. **Other Alternatives** If you were to rewrite this benchmark using alternative approaches, some options might include: * Using `String.prototype.includes()` instead of `indexOf === 1`, which would provide a more modern and efficient way to check for substring presence. * Implementing a custom parsing algorithm that's optimized for performance, potentially using techniques like caching or memoization. **Benchmark Preparation Code** To prepare this benchmark, you would create an array of URLs (`args`) and define two test cases: ```javascript // Define the input array const args = [ // ... (30 URLs) ]; // Test case 1: Regex.test function testRegex() { const regex = /[a-zA-Z]{2}=.*/; return args.filter((url) => regex.test(url)); } // Test case 2: indexOf === 1 function testIndexOf() { return args.filter((url) => url.indexOf("=") === 1); } ``` To run the benchmark, you would call one of these functions and measure its performance using a tool like MeasureThat.net.
Related benchmarks:
Multiple RegExp Replacer
Split string
Клавиатура
lodash vs arr
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?