Benchmark: check 2 arrays - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var arr1 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= 100; i++) { arr1.push({
	id: i,
  text: 'blabla-' + i
}); }

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= 150; i+=2) { arr2.push({
	id: i,
  text: 'blabla-' + i
}); }

Tests:

lodash
_.intersectionWith(arr1, arr2, (a,b) => a.id == b.id);
filter includes
arr1.filter(a => arr2.includes(a) );
Map/Set
const s = new Set(arr2); arr1.filter(a => s.has(a));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
filter includes
Map/Set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

_.isEmpty vs !array || !array.length
Test Array Speed
lodash difference vs ES6 Set
Spread Operator vs Lodash [2]
Array From vs lodash clone

check 2 arrays (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash vs filter includes vs Map/Set

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash

filter includes

Map/Set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results