Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JSON Perf
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON vs parseInt vs parseFloat
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
JSON
JSON.parse("42.001")
parseInt
parseInt("42.001", 10)
parseFloat
parseFloat("42.001")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON
parseInt
parseFloat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=601288" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
parseInt
232.0M/s
parseFloat
55.6M/s
JSON
32.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
parseInt
231,998,096 Ops/sec
parseFloat
55,567,128 Ops/sec
JSON
32,270,174 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Test Cases** The provided JSON represents three individual test cases: 1. `JSON.parse("42.001")`: This test case is testing the performance of the `JSON.parse()` function, which is used to parse a JSON string into a JavaScript object. 2. `parseInt("42.001", 10)`: This test case is testing the performance of the `parseInt()` function, which is used to convert a string to an integer value. The second argument (base 10 in this case) specifies the radix (number system) of the input string. 3. `parseFloat("42.001")`: This test case is testing the performance of the `parseFloat()` function, which is similar to `parseInt()`, but converts a string to a floating-point number instead. **Comparison of Options** The three functions being tested are part of the standard JavaScript API: * `JSON.parse()` is used for parsing JSON strings into JavaScript objects. * `parseInt()` is used for converting strings to integers. * `parseFloat()` is used for converting strings to floating-point numbers. Each function has its own pros and cons: * `JSON.parse()`: + Pros: It's specifically designed for parsing JSON strings, which can be beneficial for security reasons (e.g., preventing XSS attacks). + Cons: It may introduce additional overhead due to the complexity of JSON parsing. * `parseInt()`: + Pros: It's a simple and efficient way to convert strings to integers. + Cons: It may not work correctly with non-numeric input strings, which can lead to incorrect results. * `parseFloat()`: + Pros: It's similar to `parseInt()` but provides more flexibility by allowing for decimal values. + Cons: It also has limitations when dealing with non-numeric input strings. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that these functions are part of the standard JavaScript API and don't require any external libraries to be used. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the benchmark test cases explicitly use special JavaScript features or syntax (e.g., async/await, Promises, etc.). If there were any specific features being tested, they might have been mentioned in the `Benchmark Definition` section or in additional context not provided here. **Other Alternatives** If you needed to benchmark similar functions or alternatives, some examples could include: * Using a different library or implementation of JSON parsing (e.g., `json5`, `json3`) versus the standard JavaScript `JSON.parse()` function. * Benchmarking alternative methods for converting strings to integers or floating-point numbers, such as using `Number()` instead of `parseInt()` or `parseFloat()`. * Comparing performance of different algorithms or data structures for parsing or processing JSON strings. However, for these specific test cases (`JSON.parse()`, `parseInt()`, and `parseFloat()`), the standard JavaScript API is already being used.
Related benchmarks
json performance
Spread vs JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())
deep json spread vs flat
URLSearchParams vs JSON performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?