Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var max2 = 100; var data = []; for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { data.push({ id: i }); }
Tests:
Lodash
_.groupBy(data, ({ id }) => id)
Native
data.reduce((acc, item) => { acc[item.id] = item; return acc; }, {})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to group an array of objects by a common property: `_.groupBy` from the Lodash library, and `Array.reduce`. The benchmark is designed to test how these two methods compare in terms of execution speed on a Linux desktop with Chrome 105 browser. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Lodash ( _.groupBy )**: This test case uses the `_groupBy` function from Lodash to group the array by the `id` property. 2. **Native ( Array.reduce )**: This test case uses the `Array.reduce` method to achieve the same grouping as in the Lodash test. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as data manipulation, string manipulation, and more. The `_groupBy` function takes an array and a callback function as input, where the callback function defines the property to group by. In this benchmark, the `_groupBy` function is used to group the array of objects by their `id` property. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Lodash ( _.groupBy )**: Pros: + More concise and readable code + Handles edge cases, such as grouping empty arrays or null values * Cons: + Adds an external dependency (Lodash) + May have a higher overhead due to the addition of another library * **Native ( Array.reduce )**: Pros: + No external dependencies + More control over implementation details * Cons: + Requires more code and is less concise + May require additional logic for edge cases **Other Considerations** * The benchmark only measures execution speed, not memory usage or other performance metrics. * The test data consists of an array with `max2` number of elements (100), which may be too small to capture the full range of possible performance variations. **Alternatives** If you want to write your own group-by function without using a library like Lodash, you can implement it using other methods, such as: * Using `Object.keys()` and `reduce()` * Using `Array.prototype.forEach()` * Implementing a custom loop Alternatively, if you prefer the conciseness of Lodash's `_groupBy` function but still want to avoid its external dependency, you could consider implementing your own version using pure JavaScript functions. Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between two common approaches to group-by functionality in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce on million items
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k corrected
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k with array push
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k better 2
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce vs Object.groupBy 100k
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?