Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Split vs Regex 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Splitting vs Regex
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var testString = "testing\nNewlines\nBleh"
Tests:
Splitting
var values = testString.split("\n"); var value1 = values[0]; var value2 = values[1]; var value3 = values[2];
Regex
var regex = /.+((?=\n)|$)/g var value1 = regex[0]; var value2 = regex[1]; var value3 = regex[2];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Splitting
Regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on it. **Overview** The website MeasureThat.net provides a platform for JavaScript microbenchmarks, allowing users to create and run tests to compare different approaches for splitting strings. In this case, we're looking at two test cases: "Splitting" and "Regex". The benchmark aims to measure which method (split or regular expression) is faster. **Options being compared** We have two options being compared: 1. **Split**: This uses the `String.prototype.split()` method, which splits a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator. 2. **Regex**: This uses a regular expression (`/.+((?=\\n)|$)/g`) to split the input string into three parts: before the first newline, between newlines, and after the last newline. **Pros and Cons** * **Split**: + Pros: Generally faster than regex for simple cases. + Cons: May not work correctly if the separator is not present in the string (e.g., empty strings or no separators at all). * **Regex**: + Pros: Can handle more complex cases, such as splitting on multiple delimiters or with variable-length separators. + Cons: Generally slower than split for simple cases and may be affected by the complexity of the regex pattern. **Library used** In this case, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, if we examine the `Benchmark Definition` JSON, we see that the `regex` variable uses a string with a forward slash (`/`) prefix, which is a common way to denote a regular expression in JavaScript. **Special JS feature/syntax (none)** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark that would be unfamiliar to most software engineers. **Other alternatives** Other approaches for splitting strings could include: * Using the `Array.prototype.reduce()` method * Utilizing a library like `lodash` with its `split` function * Using a custom implementation using loop-based iteration It's worth noting that MeasureThat.net likely provides additional test cases and variations to cover more scenarios, such as different separator types (e.g., whitespace, punctuation) or edge cases (e.g., empty strings, null inputs). In summary, this benchmark tests the performance of two common string splitting approaches in JavaScript: `String.prototype.split()` and regular expressions. The results will help users determine which method is faster for their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
String split using regex vs string v3
regex vs split lucas ribeiro
string.split(RegExp); vs string.split(string);
Javascript Split vs Regex
Js Split vs Regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?