Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
dayjs vs datefns (calculations)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
datefns vs dayjs
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/dayjs/1.10.7/dayjs.min.js" integrity="sha512-bwD3VD/j6ypSSnyjuaURidZksoVx3L1RPvTkleC48SbHCZsemT3VKMD39KknPnH728LLXVMTisESIBOAb5/W0Q==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.30.1/date_fns.min.js" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.__date__ = new Date(); window.__dayjs__ = dayjs(__date__);
Tests:
datefns
dateFns.addYears(__date__, 2);
dayjs
__dayjs__.add(2, "year");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
datefns
dayjs
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two date calculation libraries: `dateFns` and `dayjs`. The test cases are designed to measure how long it takes for each library to perform specific calculations on a sample date. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **dateFns**: A modern JavaScript library that provides functions for working with dates, including calculation methods like `addYears`. 2. **dayjs**: Another popular JavaScript library for date manipulation and calculation. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **dateFns**: + Pros: More flexible and customizable, supports a wide range of date calculations. + Cons: May be slower than dayjs due to its more complex implementation. * **dayjs**: + Pros: Faster execution times, simpler and more concise API. + Cons: Less flexible and less customizable than dateFns. **Library Descriptions** 1. **dateFns**: A lightweight JavaScript library that provides a simple and consistent API for working with dates. Its `addYears` method adds years to a given date. 2. **dayjs**: A fast and efficient JavaScript library for date manipulation and calculation. It provides a concise API for common tasks, such as adding years to a date. **Special JS Features/Syntax** Neither of the tested libraries uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require an explanation. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries for date calculations in JavaScript, some other options include: * **moment.js**: A widely used library for working with dates and times. * **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript library for dates and times, known for its high performance and ease of use. * **Date-fn's own alternatives**: As part of the same project as dateFns, there are also some alternative libraries that can be used to replace dayjs. **Benchmark Considerations** When interpreting the benchmark results, consider the following factors: * **Execution times**: The time it takes for each library to execute a specific test case. In this case, `dateFns` is slightly slower than `dayjs`. * **Browser and device platform**: The benchmark was run on Opera 96 on a Windows desktop, which may affect the results. * **Number of executions per second**: This metric indicates how many times each library can execute in one second. In this case, `dateFns` is faster. Overall, the benchmark suggests that `dayjs` is currently faster than `dateFns` for simple date calculations like adding years to a date. However, the results may vary depending on specific use cases and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (parsing)
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (formatting)
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (calculations)
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (calculations) new
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?