Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
happy1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String vs Array
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
String
['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].toString().includes('hasName')
Array
['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].includes('hasName')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String
Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark tests and their implications for software engineers. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a platform that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks, which are small pieces of code designed to measure the performance of specific aspects of JavaScript. The website provides a way to compare different approaches to achieve a common goal, such as string or array comparison. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **String Comparison** ```json "['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].toString().includes('hasName')" ``` This benchmark tests the performance of using `includes()` on a string. The code converts an array to a string and then calls `includes()` on it. Pros: * Simple and easy to understand. * Well-supported by most JavaScript engines. Cons: * May not be optimized for specific use cases (e.g., searching for a substring in a large string). * Can lead to performance issues if the resulting string is very large. 2. **Array Comparison** ```json "['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].includes('hasName')" ``` This benchmark tests the performance of using `includes()` on an array. The code uses the same logic as the previous test case, but with an array instead of a string. Pros: * More efficient than using `toString()` and `includes()` on a string. * Suitable for searching for an element in a large array. Cons: * May not work correctly if the array contains many duplicate elements (since `includes()` uses a linear search algorithm). * Can be slower than other approaches, such as using a data structure like a binary search tree or a hash table. **Library Usage** The test cases use the following library: JavaScript's built-in `Array.prototype.includes()` method and `String.prototype.toString()` method. The `includes()` method is a relatively modern addition to JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) that provides an efficient way to search for an element in an array. It uses a binary search algorithm under the hood, making it suitable for large arrays. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark test case. **Other Alternatives** For string comparison, some alternative approaches might include: * Using `indexOf()` instead of `includes()`, which can be more efficient but may lead to performance issues if the search string is not found. * Implementing a custom substring search algorithm using bitwise operations or other optimized techniques. * Using a data structure like a trie (prefix tree) or a suffix array for fast substring searching. For array comparison, some alternative approaches might include: * Using `some()` instead of `includes()`, which can be more efficient but may lead to performance issues if the predicate is not found. * Implementing a custom binary search algorithm using bitwise operations and indexing. * Using a data structure like a hash table or a balanced binary search tree for fast element searching. In summary, MeasureThat.net provides a useful platform for comparing different approaches to string and array comparison in JavaScript. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can choose the most suitable solution for their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
tartatbrdazb
Rafa speed test 1
_.pick vs reduce
abcdfggg
JS Big Integers v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?