Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
alecs@telicent
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String vs Array
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
String
'inRepresentation,inRepresentation,hasName'.includes('hasName')
Array
['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].includes('hasName')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String
Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance of JavaScript strings and arrays using the `includes()` method. Specifically, it tests whether the string or array contains the substring or element `'hasName'`. **Options compared** There are two approaches being compared: 1. **String**: The first test case checks if a single string (`"inRepresentation,inRepresentation,hasName".includes('hasName')`) contains the substring `'hasName'`. 2. **Array**: The second test case checks if an array (`['inRepresentation','inRepresentation','hasName'].includes('hasName')`) contains the element `'hasName'`. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **String**: * Pros: Simpler to understand and implement, as it only involves a single string operation. * Cons: May not accurately represent real-world use cases, where strings might be concatenated or nested in more complex ways. 2. **Array**: * Pros: More representative of real-world scenarios, where arrays are commonly used to store and manipulate data. * Cons: Requires an additional step to create the array (concatenating strings), which may add overhead. **Library usage** None of the test cases explicitly use a library, but they do utilize built-in JavaScript methods (`includes()`). **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no specific special features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on the performance comparison between string and array operations using the `includes()` method. **Other alternatives** If you were to write your own benchmark for similar purposes, some alternative approaches might include: * Using a different method to search for the substring or element (e.g., `indexOf()`, `filter()`, etc.). * Testing with larger input sizes or more complex strings/arrays. * Comparing performance across multiple browsers or platforms. Keep in mind that the specific design and focus of your benchmark will depend on your goals and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
R vs _
prueba find vs forrrr
filter uniq
Filter vs Filter and Compact
flat vs concat (simplest) vs spread with object
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?