Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash max vs Math.max 1.17.5
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.max vs Math.max
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){ arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); }
Tests:
_.max
_.max(arr);
Math.max
Math.max(...arr)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.max
Math.max
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two functions: `_.max(arr)` from Lodash and `Math.max(...arr)`. Both functions are used to find the maximum value in an array. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Lodash's `_max` function**: This function is part of the Lodash library, a popular utility library for JavaScript. 2. **JavaScript's built-in `Math.max` function**: This is a standard function in JavaScript that can be used to find the maximum value in an array. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Lodash's `_max` function**: * Pros: Lodash is a well-maintained library with extensive documentation, making it easy to use and understand. * Cons: It adds additional overhead due to the need for a separate library, which might not be ideal for small scripts or projects where size matters. 2. **JavaScript's built-in `Math.max` function**: * Pros: This approach is lightweight and doesn't require an additional library, making it suitable for smaller projects or those with strict size constraints. * Cons: The implementation of `Math.max` might not be as efficient as Lodash's `_max` function in certain cases. **Library description** Lodash is a JavaScript utility library that provides a lot of useful functions for tasks like array manipulation, string handling, and more. The `_max` function is one of its many utility functions that can be used to find the maximum value in an array. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JS features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of `...args` in the `Math.max` implementation (in the HTML preparation code) is a modern JavaScript feature called "spread syntax" that allows for concise array notation. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to compare other implementations of the `max` function, you might consider: 1. **Using a custom implementation**: Writing your own `max` function from scratch using JavaScript's built-in functions like `reduce` or `forEach`. 2. **Using another library**: Other libraries like Moment.js (for date-related operations) or Underscore.js (similar to Lodash, but with some differences in its API). Keep in mind that the benchmark is focused on comparing Lodash's `_max` function and JavaScript's built-in `Math.max` function specifically.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash max vs Math.max (lodash 4.7.11)
Labels
Lodash max vs JS Math.max (2022)
_.max vs Math.max
Lodash.isArray vs Array.isArray (Lodash v4.17.15)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?