Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
_.isEmpty vs Array.length new
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.isEmpty vs Array.length
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.arr = [];
Tests:
_.isEmpty
_.isEmpty(window.arr);
Array.length
window.arr.length === 0;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.isEmpty
Array.length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark defines two test cases: `_.isEmpty` and `Array.length`. The first test case uses the Lodash library, specifically the `_isEmpty` function. The second test case directly accesses the `length` property of an empty array (`window.arr`). **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: 1. Using the `_.isEmpty` function from the Lodash library. 2. Directly checking if an array is empty using the `length` property. **Pros and Cons** * **_.isEmpty**: + Pros: Encapsulates the logic to check for emptiness in a reusable and maintainable way, thanks to the Lodash library. This approach is also more explicit about the intent of the code. + Cons: May introduce an additional overhead due to the use of a third-party library. Additionally, if not properly optimized, the function call might be slower than a simple array check. * **Array.length**: + Pros: Directly checks the length property of the array, which is usually a simple and fast operation. + Cons: This approach requires knowing that an empty array has a `length` property equal to 0. If the array is not initialized or has a different structure (e.g., `undefined`), this check might fail. **Library: Lodash** The `_isEmpty` function from Lodash takes an array as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the array is empty. This library provides a convenient way to perform common operations, such as checking for emptiness in arrays or objects. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and conventions. **Other Alternatives** If you want to implement the `_.isEmpty` functionality without using Lodash, you could create a simple function that checks if an array has at least one element: ```javascript function isEmpty(arr) { return arr.length === 0; } ``` Alternatively, you could use other libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided `Script Preparation Code` sets up the environment by creating an empty array on the global object (`window.arr = [];`). The `Html Preparation Code` includes a script tag to load the Lodash library. Keep in mind that this benchmark is just one example, and there are many other approaches and variations to test different performance scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
_.isEmpty vs !array || !array.length
_.isEmpty vs Array.length
_.isEmpty vs. Array.length
_.isEmpty vs Array.length for performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?