Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test lodash clamp vs math.min
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash clamp vs Manual Math.min Math.max
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.7.11/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Lodash clamp
_.clamp(150, 10, 100);
Manual Math.min Math.max
Math.min(-150, 0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash clamp
Manual Math.min Math.max
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach. **What is being tested?** The test case measures the performance difference between two approaches: 1. `_.clamp(150, 10, 100)` from the Lodash library. 2. `Math.min(-150, 0)` without any additional libraries (a manual implementation). **Options compared:** The benchmark compares the execution speed of these two approaches on a JavaScript engine. * **Lodash clamp**: Uses the `_.clamp` function from the Lodash library to perform the calculation. * **Manual Math.min Math.max**: Implements the same calculation using only built-in JavaScript functions, without any external libraries. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Lodash clamp:** * Pros: + Written in a concise and readable way, making it easier for developers to understand the implementation. + Uses the Lodash library, which provides additional utility functions that might be useful in other parts of the codebase. * Cons: + Requires including an external library (Lodash) in the test environment, which may not be ideal for production environments or when performance is a top priority. 2. **Manual Math.min Math.max:** * Pros: + Does not require including any additional libraries, making it suitable for environments where performance is critical. * Cons: + The implementation is more verbose and may be harder to read and understand compared to the Lodash version. **Library explanation (Lodash):** The `_.clamp` function from Lodash library is a utility function that returns the value of its first argument if it's less than its second argument, otherwise returns the third argument. The purpose of this function is to provide a concise way to handle conditional calculations within JavaScript code. **Special JS feature or syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. **Other alternatives:** If you need to compare more approaches, other libraries like Moment.js (for date-related functions) or underscore's `_.max` and `_.min` functions could also be considered. Additionally, other implementations of the manual calculation using built-in functions like `Math.max` and `Math.min` might be compared. Overall, this benchmark provides a clear comparison between two approaches: leveraging an external library for performance and using only built-in JavaScript functions.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash clamp vs Math.min(Math.max)
isFunction vs typeof function 6
Math.floor() vs Lodash _.floor() vs bitwise NOT
isUndefined
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?