Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
fight to the death - for loop vs chained (1000)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
for loop vs chained arr
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const randomStDate = () => { const randD = new Date(new Date("2021-12-05").getTime() + Math.random() * (new Date("2026-12-05").getTime() - new Date("2023-12-05").getTime())) let month = '' + (randD.getMonth() + 1); let day = '' + randD.getDate(); let year = randD.getFullYear(); if (month.length < 2) month = '0' + month; if (day.length < 2) day = '0' + day; return [year, month, day].join('-'); }; const rndId = Math.floor(Math.random() * (100000000 - 1 + 1) + 1) const createArr = () => { let workArr = [] for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { const pl = { tisId: rndId, startDate: randomStDate(), endDate: "2026-12-05", site: "Liverpool", } workArr.push(pl) } return workArr } var workArr = createArr() var today = new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10)
Tests:
for loop
let pastArr = []; let futureArr = []; for (let i = 0; i < workArr.length; i++) { const pl = workArr[i]; switch(true){ case pl.startDate <= today : pastArr.push(pl); break; case futureArr.length < 1 && pl.startDate > today : futureArr = [pl]; break; case futureArr.length > 0 && pl.startDate < futureArr[0].startDate : futureArr = [pl]; break; case futureArr.length > 0 && pl.startDate === futureArr[0].startDate : futureArr.push(pl); break; } } return [...pastArr, ...futureArr]
chained arr
const firstFutureWorks = workArr .filter(w => w.startDate > today) .sort((a, b) => (a.startDate > b.startDate ? 1 : -1)); const nextFutureDate = firstFutureWorks[0] ? firstFutureWorks[0].startDate : today; return workArr.filter(w => w.startDate <= nextFutureDate);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for loop
chained arr
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for sorting an array of objects based on their `startDate` property: a traditional `for` loop and a chained array method. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code generates a random array of 1000 objects, each with a random start date between December 5, 2021, and December 5, 2026. The script also defines two variables: `rndId` for generating unique IDs and `createArr` for creating the random array. **Benchmark Cases** There are two benchmark cases: 1. **For Loop**: This case uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the array and sort it based on the `startDate` property. 2. **Chained Arr**: This case uses the chained array method (e.g., `filter()`, `sort()`) to achieve the same result. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: **For Loop** Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Can be optimized for performance Cons: * May not be as efficient as other approaches due to its iterative nature * Can be slower than chained array methods for large datasets **Chained Arr** Pros: * Often faster than traditional `for` loops due to its use of optimized algorithms and caching * Can handle large datasets efficiently Cons: * May be less intuitive for developers who are not familiar with chained array methods * Can be slower in older browsers or those with limited support for modern JavaScript features **Other Considerations** 1. **Use of Date Objects**: Both benchmark cases use `Date` objects to manipulate dates. The `for` loop uses a simple comparison, while the chained arr method uses a sorting function. 2. **Randomized Data**: The benchmark uses randomized data to ensure that the results are not skewed by specific date patterns or edge cases. **Alternative Approaches** Some alternative approaches for sorting an array of objects based on a `startDate` property might include: * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provide optimized and consistent functions for sorting and filtering arrays. * Utilizing modern JavaScript features like `Array.prototype.sort()` with a custom comparison function or `Array.prototype.findIndex()` to achieve the same result. * Considering other data structures, such as a data frame or a SQL database, if the dataset is too large to fit into memory. Overall, both the `for` loop and chained array methods have their strengths and weaknesses. The choice of approach ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the project, personal preference, and performance considerations.
Related benchmarks:
fight to the death - for loop vs chained array methods (10)
fight to the death - for loop vs chained methods 1000
fight to the death - for loop vs chained methods 10,000
fight to the death - for loop vs chained methods 100,000
fight to the death - for loop vs chained methods 1,000,000
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?