Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Destructuring vs Dot notation v2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Destructuring vs Dot notation
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Destructuring
const things = [{name: 'Alan', swearing: 'Mid'}, {name: 'Jason', swearing: 'High'}, {name: 'Stuart', swearing: 'Low'}] const {swearing} = things[0]
Dot notation
const things = [{name: 'Alan', swearing: 'Mid'}, {name: 'Jason', swearing: 'High'}, {name: 'Stuart', swearing: 'Low'}] const level = things[0].swearing
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Destructuring
Dot notation
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: Destructuring and Dot Notation, both used to access properties of an object in JavaScript. The goal is to measure which approach is faster. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Destructuring**: This involves using the syntax `{name: 'Alan', swearing: 'Mid'}` to create an object and then deconstructing it into separate variables using the `const {swearing} = things[0];` syntax. 2. **Dot Notation**: This involves accessing properties of an object directly using the dot notation, like `things[0].swearing`. **Pros and Cons** Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages: **Destructuring:** Pros: * Can be more concise and readable * Can handle complex object structures with multiple levels of nesting Cons: * May not be supported by older browsers or versions of JavaScript * Can be slower due to the overhead of deconstruction **Dot Notation:** Pros: * Widely supported across different browsers and versions of JavaScript * Generally faster than destructuring due to its simplicity Cons: * Can become verbose for complex object structures * May require more lines of code to access nested properties **Library and Special JS Features** There is no library being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that both destructuring and dot notation are part of the standard JavaScript language and do not rely on any external libraries. **Special JS Feature: None mentioned** Neither approach requires a special feature or syntax beyond what is supported by modern versions of JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: 1. **Arrow functions**: Instead of using destructuring or dot notation, arrow functions can be used to access object properties: `things[0].swearing => things[0].swearing` 2. **Template literals**: Template literals can also be used to construct strings and access object properties in a more concise way: `"${things[0].swearing}"` Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide a direct comparison to destructuring and dot notation, as they serve different purposes. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
dot (.) vs destructure
object destruction vs. dot notation 2
Delete vs destructure for objects v2 2
Passing as param vs destructuring internally
Assignment of value vs Destructuring an object (direct assign insted of variable )
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?