Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Tree Traversals
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
DFS vs BFS (shift) vs BFS (pop) vs BFS (reassign queue) vs BFS (reassign node, shift) vs BFS (reassign node, pop)
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
root = {val: 1001} let i = 0, node = root while (++i < 1000) { while (node) { if (i < node.val) { if (!node.left) { node.left = { val: i } break } node = node.left } else { if (!node.right) { node.right = { val: i } break } node = node.right } } }
Tests:
DFS
function dfs(node) { if (!node) return dfs(node.left) dfs(node.right) } dfs(root)
BFS (shift)
let q = [root] while (q.length) { const node = q.shift() if (node.left) q.push(node.left) if (node.right) q.push(node.right) }
BFS (pop)
let q = [root] while (q.length) { const node = q.pop() if (node.right) q.push(node.right) if (node.left) q.push(node.left) }
BFS (reassign queue)
let q = [root] while (q.length) { const level = [] const node = q.pop() if (node.left) level.push(node.left) if (node.right) level.push(node.right) q = level }
BFS (reassign node, shift)
let q = [], node = root while (node) { if (node.left) q.push(node.left) if (node.right) q.push(node.right) node = q.shift() }
BFS (reassign node, pop)
let q = [], node = root while (node) { if (node.right) q.push(node.right) if (node.left) q.push(node.left) node = q.pop() }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
DFS
BFS (shift)
BFS (pop)
BFS (reassign queue)
BFS (reassign node, shift)
BFS (reassign node, pop)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and its test cases for you. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of different tree traversal algorithms: Depth-First Search (DFS) and Breadth-First Search (BFS). The algorithm is designed to traverse a binary tree, where each node has a value and optional left and right child nodes. The goal is to insert 1000 nodes into the tree, with values ranging from 0 to 999. **Test Cases** There are four test cases: 1. **DFS**: Uses recursion to traverse the tree. 2. **BFS (shift)**: Uses a queue data structure to enqueue nodes and then dequeue them in order. 3. **BFS (pop)**: Similar to BFS (shift), but uses a pop operation instead of shift. 4. **BFS (reassign queue)**: Reassigns the queue after each level is processed. 5. **BFS (reassign node, shift)**: Shifts the node pointer before enqueueing it into the queue. 6. **BFS (reassign node, pop)**: Pops the node pointer from the queue before enqueueing it. **Library and Special Features** None of these test cases use external libraries or special JavaScript features. They are designed to demonstrate the performance differences between various tree traversal algorithms. **Approach Comparison** The approaches can be summarized as follows: * **Recursion (DFS)**: Uses function calls to traverse the tree, which can lead to stack overflows for large trees. * **Queue-based (BFS)**: Uses a queue data structure to enqueue and dequeue nodes, which avoids recursion but may have higher overhead due to queue operations. * **Reassigning queue or node**: These approaches modify the queue or node pointer after each operation, which can lead to unexpected behavior if not implemented correctly. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **DFS (Recursion)**: + Pros: Easy to implement, natural recursive structure. + Cons: Risk of stack overflows, slower performance for large trees. * **BFS (Queue-based)**: + Pros: Avoids recursion, can be more efficient with queue operations. + Cons: May have higher overhead due to queue operations, more complex implementation. * **Reassigning queue or node**: + Pros: Can lead to improved performance by avoiding recursive function calls or queue operations. + Cons: Risk of unexpected behavior if not implemented correctly. **Alternatives** Other tree traversal algorithms that could be used as alternatives include: * Iterative DFS (using loops instead of recursion) * Level-order traversal (processing nodes at each level before moving to the next level) * Morris Traversal (a self-balancing algorithm for traversing binary search trees) These alternative algorithms may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, complexity, and memory usage.
Related benchmarks:
adejkas
Node Tree (with nextSibling) vs Direct Access
Tree Traversals (update 1)
cloneDeep vs structuredClone
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?